Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Cifuentes, 830 P.2d 469.

30 citing documents.

State v. Garcia El Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Garcia El Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Profile evidence may not be used to show guilt because “[i]t creates too high a risk that a defendant will be convicted not for what he did but for what others are doing.”
State of Arizona v. Charlie Conley Jr. 523 P.3d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State of Arizona v. Charlie Conley Jr. 523 P.3d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
The Arizona Supreme Court has opined that “profile evidence” may not be used as substantive proof of guilt because of the “risk that a defendant will be convicted not for what he did but for what others are doing.” ().
State v. Lincourt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lincourt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State of Arizona v. Erick Antonio Escalante 425 P.3d 1078 Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Erick Antonio Escalante 425 P.3d 1078 Ariz. 2018
at 545 ¶ 12 (internal quotation marks omitted) (); see also Haskie, 242 Ariz. at 586 ¶ 15 (to same effect).
State v. Tracey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Tracey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Escalante 396 P.3d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Escalante 396 P.3d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
creates too high a risk that a defendant will be convicted not for what he did but for what others are doing.” Gonzalez, 229 Ariz. at 563, ¶ 12 , 278 P.3d at 331 ( , ).
State v. Stephens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Stephens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Ketchner 339 P.3d 645 Ariz. 2014
State of Arizona v. Darrell Bryant Ketchner Ariz. 2014
State of Arizona v. Darrell Bryant Ketchner Ariz. 2014
at 545 ¶¶ 11–12, 959 P.2d at 802 ( ).
State v. Ketchner 339 P.3d 645 Ariz. 2014
at 545 ¶¶ 11-12, 959 P.2d at 802 ( , ).
State v. Garcia-Quintana 321 P.3d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Garcia-Quintana 321 P.3d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
at 545, ¶¶ 12, 14, 959 P.2d at 802; (stating that the “use of profile evidence to indicate guilt .
State v. Gonzalez 278 P.3d 328 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
State v. Gonzalez 278 P.3d 328 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
at 545, ¶¶ 12, 14 , 959 P.2d at 802 ; , (stating that the “use of profile evidence to indicate guilt ...
State v. Bass 31 P.3d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Bass 31 P.3d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
[because it] creates too high a risk that a defendant will be convicted not for what he did but for what others are doing.’ ” Lee
Beijer v. ADAMS EX REL. COUNTY OF COCONINO 993 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Beijer v. ADAMS EX REL. COUNTY OF COCONINO 993 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Lee 959 P.2d 799 Ariz. 1998
State v. Lee 959 P.2d 799 Ariz. 1998
creates too high a risk that a defendant will be convicted not for what he did but for what others are doing.”
State v. Walker 891 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Walker 891 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Although Arizona appellate courts have not directly considered the admissibility of drug courier profiles, , we condemned the admission of car theft profile evidence.