Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Korte, 566 P.2d 318.
- State v. Ricci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
State v. Ricci
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See State v. Bussdieker, 127 Ariz. 8 STATE v. RICCI Decision of the Court 339, 342 (1980)
- Wolfinger v. Cheche 80 P.3d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
-
Wolfinger v. Cheche
80 P.3d 783
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
(this court has no authority to depart from controlling decisions of the Arizona Supreme Court).
- State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
-
State v. West
862 P.2d 192
Ariz. 1993
(instructing the jury to consider the testimony of an interested witness with skepticism is an impermissible comment on the evidence)
- State v. Soule 791 P.2d 1048 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Soule 791 P.2d 1048 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Tempe Life Care Village, Inc. v. City of Tempe 714 P.2d 434 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Tempe Life Care Village, Inc. v. City of Tempe 714 P.2d 434 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- State v. Albe 713 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- State v. Albe 713 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- State of Arizona v. Lacey 694 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State of Arizona v. Lacey 694 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- Teed v. Ridco Realty, Inc. 655 P.2d 798 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
-
Teed v. Ridco Realty, Inc.
655 P.2d 798
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Aside from Jarvis being an opinion of the Court of Appeals and the Court of Appeals being unable to overrule a Supreme Court decision, , Jarvis is not in conflict with McClanahan.
- State v. McShine 642 P.2d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. McShine 642 P.2d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Wilson 626 P.2d 152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
-
State v. Wilson
626 P.2d 152
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
In spite of the great latitude permitted in cross-examination, , , trial courts have properly limited cross-examination with respect to a witness’ ability to make identification in collateral situations.
- State v. Laffoon 610 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1980
-
State v. Laffoon
610 P.2d 1045
Ariz. 1980
When determining criminal responsibility, , , the jury may consider voluntary intoxication not as a defense but as it relates to the ability to form specific intent.
- State v. Avila 617 P.2d 1155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- State v. Avila 617 P.2d 1155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- State v. Baumann 610 P.2d 38 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Baumann 610 P.2d 38 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Longoria 596 P.2d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- State v. Longoria 596 P.2d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- Sexstone v. State 622 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Sexstone v. State 622 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979