Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Scofield, 438 P.2d 776.

50 citing documents.

Jones v. Burk 795 P.2d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Jones v. Burk 795 P.2d 238 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2 790 P.2d 723 Ariz. 1990
In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2 790 P.2d 723 Ariz. 1990
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. 74802-2 781 P.2d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. 74802-2 781 P.2d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State v. Poland 645 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1982
State v. Poland 645 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1982
State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Superior Court 624 P.2d 862 Ariz. 1981
State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Superior Court 624 P.2d 862 Ariz. 1981
“Constitutional parameters permit the legislature wide discretion in selecting conduct to be penalized by criminal sanctions.”
John A. Artukovich & Sons, Inc. v. Reliance Truck Co. 614 P.2d 330 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
John A. Artukovich & Sons, Inc. v. Reliance Truck Co. 614 P.2d 330 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Duffy 603 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Duffy 603 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Leeman 581 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1978
State v. Leeman 581 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1978
State v. Leeman 580 P.2d 1202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Leeman 580 P.2d 1202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Ramirez 563 P.2d 325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Ramirez 563 P.2d 325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
357 , , R. Perkins, Criminal Law, 238 (2d Ed. 1969).
State v. Gomez 553 P.2d 1233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Gomez 553 P.2d 1233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Everson v. Everson 537 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Everson v. Everson 537 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Cole 501 P.2d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Cole 501 P.2d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Colson 499 P.2d 726 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Colson 499 P.2d 726 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
The court may at any time cause the indictment, information or bill of particulars to be amended in respect to any such variance to conform to the evidence.” This subsection of Rule 145 , by Division Two of this Court to illustrate the difference in criminal pleading requirements under the old rules and under the new rules.
Smith v. Superior Court, Pima County 495 P.2d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Smith v. Superior Court, Pima County 495 P.2d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
State v. Fulper 493 P.2d 524 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Fulper 493 P.2d 524 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
R. Perkins, Criminal Law 238 (2d Ed. 1969).
Yetman v. Naumann 492 P.2d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Yetman v. Naumann 492 P.2d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Arizona State Tax Commission v. Lawrence Manufacturing Co. 489 P.2d 860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Arizona State Tax Commission v. Lawrence Manufacturing Co. 489 P.2d 860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
State v. MacKey 489 P.2d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
State v. MacKey 489 P.2d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Sulpher Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo 481 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Sulpher Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Verdugo 481 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Barbone v. Superior Court of Pima County 462 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Barbone v. Superior Court of Pima County 462 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
81 , , ; , penal statutes which restrict the exercise of particular constitutional rights are subject to closer scrutiny as to the requisite specificity.
State Ex Rel. De Concini v. Gatewood 458 P.2d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State Ex Rel. De Concini v. Gatewood 458 P.2d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Roderick 448 P.2d 891 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Roderick 448 P.2d 891 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima County 443 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima County 443 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. McCormick 442 P.2d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. McCormick 442 P.2d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
review denied May 14, 1968.