Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Reed, 992 P.2d 1132.

35 citing documents.

State v. Edgemon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
P. 9.1; –39 ¶ 3 (App. 1999)
State of Arizona v. William Maurice Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
¶¶ 3, 7 (App. 1999); Williams
State of Arizona v. Steven Ricardo Vallejo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
State of Arizona v. Steven Ricardo Vallejo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
State of Arizona v. Analysya Contreras 557 P.3d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Analysya Contreras 557 P.3d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Dewayne Esaw 554 P.3d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Dewayne Esaw 554 P.3d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
(Sixth Amendment guarantees right to be present at trial; waiver of right to be present may be inferred pursuant to Rule 9.1.).
State v. Hunt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Hunt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Rowan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Rowan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Ruelas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Ruelas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
P. 9.1; –39, ¶ 3 (App. 1999) (citation omitted).
State v. Riggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Riggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
P. 9.1; –39, ¶ 3 (App. 1999)
State v. Blomdahl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Blomdahl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Benitez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Benitez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Though criminal defendants have a constitutional right to be present at trial, they “may voluntarily relinquish the right to attend trial.” ¶ 3 (App. 1999) (quotation omitted); see also U.S. Const. amend.
State v. Dillion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dillion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Rea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Rea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
ANALYSIS I. Standard of Review ¶8 Generally, “[w]e review the trial court’s determination of a defendant’s voluntary or involuntary absence for an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 2 (App. 1999).
State v. Washington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Washington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
–39 (App. 1999); see also Washington, 2018 WL 2016790, at *1, ¶ 4.
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 3 (App. 1999); see also Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Faccio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Faccio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In re MH 2006-000749 152 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In re MH 2006-000749 152 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
at 601-02 , 606 P.2d at 817-18 ; , (criminal defendant may waive right to be present at presentence hearing); ¶ 3 , (criminal defendant may voluntarily waive right to be present at trial).
State v. Walker 95 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Whitley 85 P.3d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Whitley 85 P.3d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
(reviewing the trial court's decision to go forward with the defendant's trial in absentia for abuse of discretion).