Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00, 18 P.3d 85.

104 citing documents.

Ellesse J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ellesse J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $26,980.00, ¶ 9 (App. 2000).
Sabatina v. Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sabatina v. Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $26,980.00, ¶ 9 (App. 2000).
State v. Banda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Banda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $26,980.00, ¶ 2 (App. 2000).
State v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
In re U.S. Currency in the Amount of $26,980.00, ¶ 2 (App. 2000) (citing In re One Residence Located at 4030 W. Avocado, and In re 1978 Dodge Trans-Van, ).
Trask v. Handley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Trask v. Handley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See In re U.S. Currency in the Amount of $26,980, ¶ 28
State of Arizona v. International Fidelity Insurance Co. and Regulator Bail Bonds 355 P.3d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. International Fidelity Insurance Co. and Regulator Bail Bonds 355 P.3d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
court’s decision.” In re $ 26,980.00 U.S. Currency
Lee v. M & H Enterprises, Inc. 347 P.3d 1153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lee v. M & H Enterprises, Inc. 347 P.3d 1153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See In re U.S. Currency in the Amount of $26,980.00, ¶ 28, (refusing to consider arguments offered without development or citation to supporting legal authority).
Chandler v. Rancho Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Chandler v. Rancho Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See, e.g., In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $26,980.00, ¶ 28, (refusing to consider bald assertions offered without elaboration or citation to legal authority); Brown v. U.S. Fid.
McA Financial Group, Ltd. v. Enterprise Bank & Trust 341 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
McA Financial Group, Ltd. v. Enterprise Bank & Trust 341 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
(findings clearly erroneous if they lack evidence that “‘permit[s] a reasonable person to reach the trial court’s result’”), quoting In re United States Currency in the Amount of $26,980.00
Gillespie-Muldrew v. Muldrew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Gillespie-Muldrew v. Muldrew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Given that restriction, this Court has previously held that it will not consider assertions “offered without elaboration or citation to any constitutional provisions or legal authority.” In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $26,980.00, ¶ 28
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In re U.S. Currency of $26,980.00, ¶ 9
STANT v. CITY OF MARICOPA EMPLOYEE MERIT BOARD 319 P.3d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
STANT v. CITY OF MARICOPA EMPLOYEE MERIT BOARD 319 P.3d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Opinion of the Court $26,980.00 U.S. Currency, 7 ¶21 The appellees have asked for an award of fees and costs on appeal pursuant to Rule 4(g), Ariz. R. P. Spec.
State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Glissendorf 311 P.3d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Glissendorf 311 P.3d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
See In re $26,980.00 U.S. Currency
Champlin Stopinski, Skipton and Assoc. v. Bank of America 293 P.3d 541 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Champlin Stopinski, Skipton and Assoc. v. Bank of America 293 P.3d 541 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
See In re $26,980.00 U.S. Currency, (appellate court must accept findings supported by substantial evidence).
Davis v. Davis 284 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Davis v. Davis 284 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
See In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $26,980.00, ¶ 28 , (refusing to consider bald assertions offered without elaboration or citation to legal authority).
Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership 279 P.3d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership 279 P.3d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $26,980.00, -99, ¶ 25 , -93 (App.2000).
In Re U.S. CURRENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
In Re U.S. CURRENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
In re $26,980.00 U.S. Currency
Hess v. Purcell 274 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Hess v. Purcell 274 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Actions 10(k); In re $26,980.00 U.S. Currency, ¶ 28 , ) (an undeveloped argument lacking record or legal support is waived).
Castro v. Ballesteros-Suarez 213 P.3d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Castro v. Ballesteros-Suarez 213 P.3d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Evidence is substantial if it allows “a reasonable person to reach the trial court’s result.” ¶ 18 , (quoting In re U.S. Currency in the Amount of $26,980.00, ¶ 9 , ).
Mont Polanco v. Ica Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Mont Polanco v. Ica Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
(Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure apply to special action review of industrial commission awards); In re $26,980.00 U.S. Currency, (“[Appellee’s] bald assertion is offered without elaboration or citation to any .
Davis v. Zlatos 123 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Davis v. Zlatos 123 P.3d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Generally, a trial court’s factual findings must be accepted on appeal unless they are “clearly erroneous.” In re United States Currency *524 in the Amount of $26,980.00, ¶ 9
In Re Commitment of Paul Frankovitch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
In Re Commitment of Paul Frankovitch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
See In re U.S. Currency of $26,980.00, P.3d 85 (App. 2000).
State v. Pena 104 P.3d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Pena 104 P.3d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
See In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $26,980.00, ¶ 20 , *498
Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa County 88 P.3d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa County 88 P.3d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
See In re U.S. Currency in the Amount of $26,980.00, ¶ 9
Cimarron Foothills Community Ass'n v. Kippen 79 P.3d 1214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Cimarron Foothills Community Ass'n v. Kippen 79 P.3d 1214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $26,980.00