Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Tenet Healthsystem TGH, Inc. v. Silver, 52 P.3d 786.

36 citing documents.

Brosnahan v. Caliber Home Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Brosnahan v. Caliber Home Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Dep’t of Revenue, ¶ 8 (App. 2017); Tenet Healthsystem TGH, ¶ 5 (App. 2002).
Yam Capital v. Bailey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Yam Capital v. Bailey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
That being said, “[o]ur law generally presumes, especially in commercial contexts, that private parties are best able to determine if particular contractual terms serve their interests.” 1800 Ocotillo, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc., ¶ 8 (2008); see also Tenet Healthsystem TGH, ¶ 7 (App. 2002) (“The nature and extent of a guarantor’s liability depends upon the terms of the guaranty contract.”).
Lapour v. Central State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Lapour v. Central State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Tenet Healthsystem TGH, { 5 (App. 2002).
Guirguis v. Patel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Guirguis v. Patel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Tenet Healthsystem TGH, ¶ 10 (App. 2002) (citing cases).
Dmarc 2006-Cd2 v. Bush Realty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dmarc 2006-Cd2 v. Bush Realty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tenet Healthsystem TGH, ¶ 7 (App. 2002) (citation omitted).
Laughlin v. Lords Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Laughlin v. Lords Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tenet Healthsystem TGH, ¶ 5
Madison v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Madison v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tenet Healthsystem TGH, ¶ 36 (App. 2002); Ariz. R. Civ.
First Fidelity v. Toll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
First Fidelity v. Toll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tenet Healthsystem TGH, ¶ 11, (declining to adopt interpretation that would “vitiate[] the guaranty’s language”); Consol.
flash/schillinger v. Samons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
flash/schillinger v. Samons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶18 A guaranty is a contract subject to typical principles of contract interpretation; “[a]s with any question of contract interpretation, our goal is to effectuate the parties’ intent, giving effect to the contract in its entirety.” Tenet Healthsystem TGH, ¶ 7 (App. 2002).
Aprea II v. Hafter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Aprea II v. Hafter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
3 APREA II v. HAFTER, et al. Decision of the Court I. Summary Judgment on Aprea’s Contract Claims ¶8 “The extent of a guarantor’s liability is governed by the terms of the guaranty agreement.” Pi'Ikea, ¶ 10, accord Tenet Healthsystem TGH, ¶ 7
Southwest Non-Profit Housing Corporation v. Nowak, Kniffen, Martell 322 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Southwest Non-Profit Housing Corporation v. Nowak, Kniffen, Martell 322 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Pi'ikea, LLC v. Williamson 321 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Pi'ikea, LLC v. Williamson 321 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Tenet Healthsystem TGH, (interpreting guaranty).
First Credit Union v. Courtney 309 P.3d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
First Credit Union v. Courtney 309 P.3d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership 279 P.3d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership 279 P.3d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Tenet Healthsystem TGH, ¶ 11
Baker v. Arizona Department of Revenue 105 P.3d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Baker v. Arizona Department of Revenue 105 P.3d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
¶ 10 On appeal from a grant of summary judgment on undisputed facts, we review de novo “whether the trial court correctly applied the law.” Tenet Healthsystem TGH, ¶ 5
Potter v. U.S. Specialty Insurance Co. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Potter v. U.S. Specialty Insurance Co. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
¶7 “As with any question of contract interpretation, our goal is to effectuate the parties’ intent, giving effect to the contract in its entirety.” Tenet Healthsystem TGH
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Carstens v. City of Phoenix 75 P.3d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Carstens v. City of Phoenix 75 P.3d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
See Tenet Healthsystem TGH, ¶ 5