Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Vasquez v. State, 206 P.3d 753.

38 citing documents.

Victor Sanchez-Ravuelta Janette Dodge v. Yavapai County Town of Dewey-Humboldt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
Victor Sanchez-Ravuelta Janette Dodge v. Yavapai County Town of Dewey-Humboldt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
(must prove duty to establish claim for negligence); (must prove duty when negligence is basis of infliction of emotional distress claim).
Brady v. Tempe life/brady/mckee/hospice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Brady v. Tempe life/brady/mckee/hospice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
NRK note that wrongful death damages are subjective.
Medley v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Medley v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
P. (“Rule”) 12(d) (“If, on a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) or (c), matters outside the pleadings are presented to, and not excluded by, the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56.”); ¶ 8 (App. 2008).
Lewis v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Lewis v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
P. (“Rule”) 12(d) (“If, on a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) or (c), matters outside the pleadings are presented to, and not excluded by, the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56.”); ¶ 8 (App. 2008).
Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa Inc 416 P.3d 824 Ariz. 2018
Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa Inc 416 P.3d 824 Ariz. 2018
214 Ariz. at 143, 145 ¶¶ 10, 16–17, 21; ¶ 33 (App. 2008).
Acri v. State 394 P.3d 660 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Acri v. State 394 P.3d 660 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 35 , (holding that, because primary purpose of identifying human remains was public safety, incidental benefit to family and friends did not establish a duty to identify); (same).
McKee v. State 388 P.3d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
McKee v. State 388 P.3d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
A. Workers’ Compensation: Exclusive Remedy ¶7 Generally, a plaintiff may bring a wrongful death claim as an “independent claim for damages sustained by the decedent’s survivors.” ¶ 16 (App. 2008).
Hogue v. City of Phoenix 378 P.3d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Hogue v. City of Phoenix 378 P.3d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 31, (agreeing that if the law imposed a duty by police undertaking, every unsolved crime could theoretically give rise to causes of action for negligent investigation by victims or their families).
Ahmad v. State 379 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ahmad v. State 379 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
§ 12-613, the jury “shall give such damages as it deems fair and just” for “the injury resulting from the death to the surviving parties.” Those injuries may include “loss of love, affection, companionship, consortium, personal anguish and suffering.” ¶ 16 , (citation omitted).
Caughlin v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Caughlin v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sandoval v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sandoval v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
at ¶¶ 9-10; -15, ¶¶ 30-35, -64 4 If Plaintiffs had asserted that the alleged negligence arose out of a failure to properly investigate a crime, the police had no duty to them.
April Abigail Guerra v. State of Arizona 348 P.3d 423 Ariz. 2015
April Abigail Guerra v. State of Arizona 348 P.3d 423 Ariz. 2015
313 ¶ 30, (“[A] special relationship between an investigating law enforcement agency and a decedent’s family member does not arise merely by the agency undertaking to investigate an accident or resulting death.”); -50 , -11 (A
Guerra v. State 323 P.3d 765 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Guerra v. State 323 P.3d 765 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC. 316 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC. 316 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
The potential damages include the “‘loss of love, affection, companionship, consortium, personal anguish and suffering.’”
Belen Loan Investors, LLC v. Myers, Baumgardner, Los Luna Highlands 296 P.3d 984 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Belen Loan Investors, LLC v. Myers, Baumgardner, Los Luna Highlands 296 P.3d 984 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
In Re Estate of Winn 237 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Estate of Winn 237 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
¶ 16 , (allowable damages in a wrongful death action include "loss of love, affection, companionship, consortium, personal anguish and suffering.").
Green v. Garriott 212 P.3d 96 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Beynon v. TREZZA 211 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Beynon v. TREZZA 211 P.3d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
of Regents, ¶¶ 35-55 , ¶¶ 7-19 , (Ariz.Ct.
Backus v. State 203 P.3d 499 Ariz. 2009
Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation v. Arizona Board of Regents 204 P.3d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation v. Arizona Board of Regents 204 P.3d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
See Vasquez v. State of Arizona, 2008 WL 4402922 , ¶ 15, , -32, ¶ 23 , -48 (App.2008); Backus v. State of Arizona, 534 Ariz. Adv.