Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Marriage of Williams, 200 P.3d 1043.

143 citing documents.

  • Dole v. Dole Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    A court abuses its discretion by making an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, ¶ 8 (App. 2008), or by making a discretionary ruling that the record does not support, ¶ 19 (App. 2009).
  • Porteous v. Francies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Porteous v. Francies Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Tarascio v. Siebers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Tarascio v. Siebers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    ¶ 8 (App. 2008) (citing Grant v. Ariz. Pub.
  • Moyer v. Moyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Hovannisian v. Hovannisian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Moyer v. Moyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Hovannisian v. Hovannisian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    ¶ 11 (App. 2008) (holding that the reasonableness of a party’s position is evaluated by 11 HOVANNISIAN v. HOVANNISIAN Decision of the Court an objective standard).
  • Munoz v. Zepeda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Munoz v. Zepeda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    ¶19 For the first time in her reply brief, Mother relies on to argue that the court applied the incorrect standard when considering her request.
  • Carroll v. Carroll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Carroll v. Carroll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Imatdinov v. Imatdinov Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Imatdinov v. Imatdinov Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Peralta v. Peralta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Peralta v. Peralta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Gann v. Gann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Gann v. Gann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    An abuse of discretion occurs when the court “commits an error of law in the process of reaching a discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 8 (App. 2008).
  • Hernandez v. Fabian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Hernandez v. Fabian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Ward v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Ward v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Emilio v. vip/auto-owners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Emilio v. vip/auto-owners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    ¶ 13 (App. 2008) (citations omitted).
  • El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    “An abuse of discretion occurs when a court commits an error of law in the process of reaching a discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 8 (App. 2008) (citing Grant v. Ariz. Pub.
  • Paul E. v. Courtney F. 418 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Paul E. v. Courtney F. 418 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    In re Marriage of Williams , , 548, ¶ 10, , 1045 (App. 2008).
  • Wellman v. Waits Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Wellman v. Waits Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    –42, ¶¶ 16-17 (App. 2010) (considering a party’s conduct prior to the proceedings but only insofar as it informed the court as to the reasonableness of the party’s legal position); -49, ¶¶ 10, 12 (App. 2008) (explaining that A.R.S.
  • Stringer v. Stringer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Stringer v. Stringer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Among such factors are the relative financial disparity between the parties, the ability of the parties to pay the fees, the ratio of fees owed to assets owned, and ‘other similar matters.’” ¶ 15 (App. 2008).
  • Vanden Bosch v. Vanden Bosch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Vanden Bosch v. Vanden Bosch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    A court commits an abuse of discretion when it “commits an error of law in the process of reaching a discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 8 (App. 2008).
  • Schickner v. Schickner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Schickner v. Schickner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    ¶ 36 (App. 2011); ¶ 8 (App. 2008).
  • Meadows v. Jeffers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Meadows v. Jeffers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Kazi v. Saleem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Kazi v. Saleem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Although Mother suggests this conduct was not objectively unreasonable, ¶ 10, (explaining that an objective standard applies in considering reasonableness), the family court was in the best position to observe and assess the parties’ conduct, MacMillan, 226 Ariz. at 592, ¶ 38, 250 P.3d at 1221.
  • Johnston v. Johnston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Johnston v. Johnston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    l court, in dissolution matters, to award attorneys’ fees upon consideration of “the financial resources of both parties and the reasonableness of the positions each party has taken throughout the proceedings.” As the trial court recognized, § 25-324(A) “requires that the propriety of a litigant’s legal position be evaluated by an objective standard of reasonableness.” ¶ 10 (App. 2008).
  • Noorda v. Rasor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Noorda v. Rasor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Attorney Fees ¶19 “We review a trial court’s denial of a party’s request for an award of attorney fees for an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 8 (App. 2008).
  • In Re the Marriage of Allen 386 P.3d 1287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
  • In Re the Marriage of Allen 386 P.3d 1287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
    A court abuses its discretion when it “commits an error of law in the process of reaching a discretionary conclusion.”
  • Grubb v. Thraikill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Grubb v. Thraikill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    “A family court abuses its discretion by making an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, or making a discretionary ruling that the record does not support.” ¶ 8 (App. 2012) ( ¶ 8 (App. 2008), ¶ 19 (App. 2009)).
  • Bentley v. Bentley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016