Cited by

¶ 7 (App. 2010) (citation omitted).

“[I]n the absence of a transcript, we presume the evidence and arguments presented at the hearing support the trial court’s ruling.” ¶ 9 (App. 2010); see also ARCAP 11(c)(1)(A) (appellant must order transcripts not already in the official record if “necessary for proper consideration of the issues on appeal”).

¶8 “Due process requires notice ‘reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.’” ¶ 19 (App. 2010) (quoting Mullane v. Cent.

This court reviews the denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 7 (App. 2010), and may affirm if the superior court was correct for any reason, ¶ 7 (App. 2013)

“It is the appellant’s burden to ensure that ‘the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.’ And, in the absence of a transcript, we presume the evidence and arguments presented at the hearing support the trial court’s ruling.” ¶ 9 (App. 2010) ().

That is, notice must be “reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.” ¶ 19 (App. 2010).

¶11 Wife also argues that Husband’s motion to set aside was untimely because he failed to show (1) his delay was excusable, (2) he acted promptly in seeking relief, and (3) he had a “meritorious defense” to an award of spousal maintenance, ¶ 7 (App. 2010).

Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure ("ARCAP") 11(c)(1)(A), (B); ¶ 9 (App. 2010)

4 In reviewing a denial of a motion to set aside, “[w]e view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s ruling.” ¶ 2 (App. 2010) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2010), ).

Dodev contends that “five naked service attempts, without reaching out to immediate family members, work place(s), neighbors, and/or making phone calls to determine if the subject is even in town at the time of the alleged service attempts, neither constitute impracticability, nor warrants a motion for or

¶11 “It is the appellant’s burden to ensure that the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.” ¶ 9 (App. 2010) (internal quotations and citation omitted).

¶ 9, (citations omitted).

The court, after noting that Rule 60(c)(4) allows a court to set aside a final judgment that is void, P.3d 898 (App. 2010), and noted that “[a] party seeking relief from a void judgment need not demonstrate that they acted promptly or that they had a meritorious defense.” Because a judgment based on improper service of process is void and can always be challenged, the court did not err.

¶ 7 (App. 2010); City of Phx.

App. P. 11(b)(1) (an appellant is required to include all relevant transcripts in the record on appeal); ¶ 9, (same).

DAVIES v. DAVIES Decision of the Court 217, ¶ 9, see also ARCAP 11(b)(1) (“If the appellant intends to urge on appeal that a finding or conclusion is unsupported by the evidence or is c

¶ 11, (“[W]e may infer additional findings of fact and conclusions of law sufficient to sustain the trial court’s order as long as those findings are reasonably supported by the evidence, and not in conflict with any express findings.” (citation omitted)); ¶ 23, (“In denying Appellants’ motion .

¶ 20 “[W]here a judgment is challenged on voidness grounds, ‘[t]he movant generally bears the burden of demonstrating his entitlement to have a default judgment set aside.’” ¶ 7 , (quoting Miller v. Nat’l Franchise Sens., Inc., , ).