Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Thompson v. Pima County, 243 P.3d 1024.
- WAGNER v. ARIZONA MUNICIPAL Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
WAGNER v. ARIZONA MUNICIPAL
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
P. 56(a); ¶ 5 (App. 2010).
- Pelchat v. Banner Health Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Pelchat v. Banner Health
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
as an excuse for prolonged inattention when a statute’s clear policy calls for promptness.”); ¶ 14 (App. 2010) (holding that lacking an expert opinion did not toll the statute of limitations).
- Chandler v. Roosevelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Chandler v. Roosevelt
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Under § 12–821, “[a] plaintiff need not know all the facts underlying a cause of action to trigger accrual.” ¶ 12 (App. 2010) ( ¶ 32 (1998)).
- Jeannine Liberti v. City of Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
-
Jeannine Liberti v. City of Scottsdale
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
But the plaintiff must at least possess a minimum requisite of knowledge sufficient to identify that a wrong occurred and caused injury.” ().
- Perez v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Perez v. Circle K
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
P. 56(a); ¶ 5 (App. 2010).
- Lehman v. Washburn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Lehman v. Washburn
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
P. 56(a); ¶ 5 (App. 2010).
- Bade v. Powar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Bade v. Powar
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
P. 56(a); ¶ 5 (App. 2010).
- Laurence v. Srp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Laurence v. Srp
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
P. 56(a); ¶ 5 (App. 2010).
- Ager v. a Better Today Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Ager v. a Better Today
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
P. 56(a); ¶ 5 (App. 2010).
- Strojnik v. Brnovich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Strojnik v. Brnovich
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
§ 12-821.01(A); ¶ 10 (App. 2010).
- State v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
State v. Abor
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 32 (1998); ¶ 14 (App. 2010).
- Tappan v. Abor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Tappan v. Abor
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
accrue.” ¶ 12 (App. 2010).
- Paulden v. Big Chino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Paulden v. Big Chino
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
P. 56(a); ¶ 5 (App. 2010).
- Lane-Jacobson v. Mercury Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Lane-Jacobson v. Mercury
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
P. 56(a); ¶ 5 (App. 2010).
- Fitz v. Colton Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Fitz v. Colton Group
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
P. 56(a); ¶ 5 (App. 2010).
- Carlson v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Carlson v. Phillips
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-47, ¶ 14 (App. 2010) (question of when cause of action accrued for purposes of § 12-821.01 usually one of fact unless relevant facts are undisputed); -15, ¶ 17 (2002) (same principle under common-law discovery rule).
- Humphrey v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Humphrey v. State
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
accrue.” ¶ 12 (App. 2010).
- Kresock v. Depaoli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Kresock v. Depaoli
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
aware of the necessary facts underlying [his] cause of action.” -47, ¶ 14 (App. 6 KRESOCK v. DEPAOLI Decision of the Court 2010) ( ¶ 32 (1998)).
- Scorzo v. Az med/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Scorzo v. Az med/state
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-47, ¶ 14, -29 (App. 2010).
- Viniegra v. Town of Parker Municipal Property Corp. 383 P.3d 665 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Viniegra v. Town of Parker Municipal Property Corp.
383 P.3d 665
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
But the plaintiff must at least possess a minimum requisite of knowledge sufficient to identify a wrong occurred and caused injury.” ¶ 12 (App. 2010) ( ¶ 32 (1998)); ¶ 9 (App. 2010) (holding that cause of action accrues when plaintiff knew or should have known that he was injured by a defendant’s negligent act) (citation omitted).
- Watkins v. Arpaio 367 P.3d 72 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Watkins v. Arpaio
367 P.3d 72
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
But the plaintiff must at least possess a minimum requisite of knowledge sufficient to identify that a wrong occurred and caused injury.” Thus, “[t]he relevant inquiry is when did a plaintiffs ‘knowledge, understanding, and acceptance in the aggregate provide [ ] sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action.’ ” ¶ 12 , (citations omitted).
- Snyder v. banner/goel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Snyder v. banner/goel
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See id.; -47, ¶¶ 12-15, -29 (App. 2010) (summary judgment proper because plaintiffs had reasonable notice to investigate the cause of the injury).
- Patterson v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Patterson v. State
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 12, ¶¶ 12-13, (rejecting argument that a cause of action for medical malpractice did not accrue until the Board of Medical Examiners made its final ruling).