Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sholes v. Fernando, 268 P.3d 1112.

84 citing documents.

Iftiger v. Weston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Iftiger v. Weston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“[E]ven where conflicting evidence exists, this court will not reweigh the evidence and we affirm the trial court’s ruling [if] substantial evidence supports it.” ¶ 15 (App. 2011) (citation and internal quotations omitted).
Culver City v. Reyes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Culver City v. Reyes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Motta v. Flagstar Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Motta v. Flagstar Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
But we do not reweigh evidence on appeal, ¶ 15 (App. 2011) (citation omitted), and “[w]here the evidence is in conflict, we will not substitute our opinion thereof for that of the trial court,” Anderson v. Artesia Inv.
Unted v. Gammage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Unted v. Gammage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Munoz v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Munoz v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Silverwood v. Kush Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Silverwood v. Kush Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
1 We view “the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s ruling.” ¶ 2 (App. 2011).
Baron v. Dillard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Baron v. Dillard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See ARCAP 13(a)(7); ¶ 16 (App. 2011).
Jurgen M., Ashley C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jurgen M., Ashley C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lewis v. Rehkow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lewis v. Rehkow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Kohner v. Pyper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Kohner v. Pyper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
n.2, ¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2011).
Muhammad v. Bashas' Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Muhammad v. Bashas' Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
n.2, ¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2011).
Price v. City of Mesa 339 P.3d 650 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Price v. City of Mesa 339 P.3d 650 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
n. 2, ¶ 2, n. 2 (App. 2011).
Tavilla v. Blue Cross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Tavilla v. Blue Cross Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
n.2, ¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2011); State Farm Mut.
In Re the Marriage of Thorn 330 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
In Re the Marriage of Thorn 330 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Co. of Arizona, 236 P. 704, 706 (1925) (“One who misconceives the law governing his rights in a trial, and succeeds in convicting the court thereof, ought to be estopped to take any advantage of it upon appeal.”)
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
App. P. 13(a)(6); n.1, n.1 (App. 2011).
The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC. 316 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC. 316 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLC 312 P.3d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLC 312 P.3d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by