Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc., 270 P.3d 852.

56 citing documents.

Premier Consulting v. Peace Releaf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Premier Consulting v. Peace Releaf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Eng’g, Inc., -28, ¶ 6 (App. 2011) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).
Augee v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Augee v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2011).
Kunasek v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Kunasek v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 6 (App. 2011) (JMOL motion).
Borowsky v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Borowsky v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 16 (App. 2011) (privity of contract must exist before a party may seek to enforce a contract).
Vacc v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Vacc v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 7 (App. 2011).
Best v. Villarreal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Best v. Villarreal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 7 (App. 2011) (explaining that to prevail on a breach of contract claim, a claimant must prove a contract existed between the parties, the other party breached that contract, and the claimant suffered damages as a result).
Armiros v. Rohr 416 P.3d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Armiros v. Rohr 416 P.3d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 7 (App. 2011), both Julie and Evangelos were experienced eBay users who understood how to sell and purchase items through eBay.
Webb v. Farm Bureau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Webb v. Farm Bureau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 6 (App. 2011).
Whitestone v. Jade Palace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Whitestone v. Jade Palace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 7 (App. 2011).
Hawkins v. Secura Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Hawkins v. Secura Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 6 (App. 2011).
Turley v. Beus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Turley v. Beus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2011), and Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.01 (2006)); see also Duenas, 236 Ariz. at 139, ¶ 27 (noting agent “could not contractually limit [the principals’] personal claims without their assent”).
ABCDW LLC v. Banning 388 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
ABCDW LLC v. Banning 388 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Noguero v. American Family Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Noguero v. American Family Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Goodman v. Physical Resource Eng’g., Inc., ¶ 6
Sobieski v. American Standard Insurance Co. 382 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sobieski v. American Standard Insurance Co. 382 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Eng'g, Inc., ¶ 6 (App. 2011).
Escareno Ex Rel. Estate of Escareno v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. 366 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Escareno Ex Rel. Estate of Escareno v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. 366 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Hague v. Bill Houston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Hague v. Bill Houston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 6, (citations omitted).
Kool v. Evans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Kool v. Evans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 6 (App. 2011).
Johnson v. Swing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Johnson v. Swing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Don C. Robertson v. Robert E. Alling Ariz. 2015
Robertson v. Alling 351 P.3d 352 Ariz. 2015
Robertson v. Alling 351 P.3d 352 Ariz. 2015
Eng’g, Inc., , 29 ¶ 12, the Ailing Group’s interpretation would eliminate application of the apparent authority doctrine to an attorney’s acts.
Don C. Robertson v. Robert E. Alling Ariz. 2015
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 12, the Alling Group’s interpretation would eliminate application of the apparent authority doctrine to an attorney’s acts.
Maria J. v. Dcs, R.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Maria J. v. Dcs, R.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 6, (citations omitted); ¶ 24
Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. Petta 343 P.3d 438 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. Petta 343 P.3d 438 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eng’g, Inc., -28, ¶ 6, -55 (App. 2011); A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control Dist.
Baldino v. Greenburg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Baldino v. Greenburg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Griego v. Ada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Griego v. Ada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Eng’g, Inc., ¶ 12, (applying Restatement (Third) of Agency § 1.01 (2006)).
Covino v. Forrest Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Covino v. Forrest Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014