Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mahar v. Acuna, II, 287 P.3d 824.

95 citing documents.

Kitchel v. Kitchel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
The superior court abuses its discretion when it commits an error of law or “when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 14 (App. 2012) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
King v. King Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
King v. King Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Order P. 42(a)(2), (b)(2); -34, ¶¶ 11-12 (App. 2012).
Graves v. Slawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Graves v. Slawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Bennett v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Moreno v. Beltran 480 P.3d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Moreno v. Beltran 480 P.3d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶9 the appellant appealed from an order of protection that prohibited him from possessing firearms.
Bennett v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Order P. 42(a)(2), (b)(2); -34, ¶¶ 11-12 (App. 2012).
Pereida v. Villanueva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Pereida v. Villanueva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Kaden V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Kaden V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“The court abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or ‘when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.’” ¶ 5 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 14 (App. 2012)).
Harter v. Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Harter v. Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Agfd v. Scheeler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Agfd v. Scheeler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Salazar v. Guevara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Salazar v. Guevara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Vera v. Hon rogers/chaidez 433 P.3d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Vera v. Hon rogers/chaidez 433 P.3d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
P. 42(a)(2); ¶ 11 (App. 2012) (signed order of protection issued after a hearing is a final, appealable order under the Rules of Protective Order Procedure, A.R.S.
Nicaise v. Sundaram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicaise v. Sundaram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 922(g)(8)(C)(ii); ¶ 15 (App. 2012).
Gonzales v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gonzales v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
The court “abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or ‘when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support it.’” ¶10 (App. 2014) ( ¶14 (App. 2012)).
Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Fisher v. Fisher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Fisher v. Fisher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Order P. 42(a)(2), (b)(2); -34, ¶¶ 11-12, -28 (App. 2012).3 ANALYSIS ¶6 Father argues that the superior court abused its discretion in granting and affirming the order of protection and Notice of PBI.
Chereka v. Gadissa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Chereka v. Gadissa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article 6, Section 9, of the Arizona Constitution, and Arizona Revised Statutes section 12-120.21(A)(1) and -2101(A)(1) (2016).2 1 We view the facts “in the light most favorable to upholding the [superior] court’s ruling.” ¶ 2 (App. 2012).
Sachs v. Sachs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sachs v. Sachs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
The decree was entered on October 1, 2014 and 1 We view the facts “in the light most favorable to upholding the [superior] court’s ruling.” ¶ 2 (App. 2012).
In Re $15,379 in U.S. Currency 388 P.3d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
In Re $15,379 in U.S. Currency 388 P.3d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Kroon v. Kroon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kroon v. Kroon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Denmon v. Safarian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Denmon v. Safarian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 2 (App. 2012) (citing IB Prop.
City Center Executive Plaza, LLC v. Jantzen 344 P.3d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
City Center Executive Plaza, LLC v. Jantzen 344 P.3d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
P. 54(a); , 533 ¶ 11, see also Ariz. Farmers Prod.
Savord v. Morton 330 P.3d 1013 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Savord v. Morton 330 P.3d 1013 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
A trial court abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or “when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 14, (internal quotation marks omitted).
Michaelson v. Garr 323 P.3d 1193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Michaelson v. Garr 323 P.3d 1193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
3 1 On appeal, we view the facts “in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s ruling.” ¶ 2