Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite First Credit Union v. Courtney, 309 P.3d 929.

27 citing documents.

Goudeau v. Goudeau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Goudeau v. Goudeau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
§ 14-2502; ¶ 7 (App. 2013) (noting ruling may be affirmed if it is correct for any reason).4 II.
Cravens v. Montano 567 P.3d 745 Ariz. 2025
Cravens v. Montano 567 P.3d 745 Ariz. 2025
–11 ¶ 23 (App. 2013) (“We construe the contract as a whole and do not render any portion of it meaningless.”).
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Qasimyar v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Qasimyar v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
National Equity v. Mwm Forever Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
National Equity v. Mwm Forever Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
This court reviews the denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 7 (App. 2010), and may affirm if the superior court was correct for any reason, ¶ 7 (App. 2013)
State v. McCcd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State ex rel. Brnovich v. Maricopa County Community College District Board 395 P.3d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. McCcd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See John Munic Enters., ¶ 5 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 9 (App. 2013)).
State ex rel. Brnovich v. Maricopa County Community College District Board 395 P.3d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See John Munic Enters., ¶ 5 , ( ¶ 9 , ).
Calhoun v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Calhoun v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Interpretation of statutes and rules is reviewed de novo, ¶ 9 (App. 2011), and this court may affirm if the superior court was correct for any reason, ¶ 7 (App. 2013).
Ader v. Estate of Felger 375 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Ader v. Estate of Felger 375 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Laughlin v. Lords Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Laughlin v. Lords Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
“When the meaning is plain from the statutory language, we look no further and assume the legislature meant what it said.”
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Pi'ikea, LLC v. Williamson 321 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Pi'ikea, LLC v. Williamson 321 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
This common law defense applies to guaranties, (App. 2Pi’Ikea asserted in its answering brief that from the time of default until May 2012, the Bank and TBM were attempting to reach a settlement.
Acosta v. Kiewit-Sundt 316 P.3d 1263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Acosta v. Kiewit-Sundt 316 P.3d 1263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by