Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of Arizona, 311 P.3d 1075.
- In Re the Marriage of Duvall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
-
In Re the Marriage of Duvall
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
of Ariz., (quoting Montaño v. Browning, ); see Mertola, (cause of action accrues and statute of limitations commences when one party is able to sue another).
- Chandler v. Roosevelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Chandler v. Roosevelt
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
of Regents, ¶ 17 (App. 2013) (“This court has held .
- Brown v. Olde Fashioned Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Brown v. Olde Fashioned
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
of Ariz., ¶ 6 (App. 2013).
- Bowyer v. Bowyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Bowyer v. Bowyer
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
of Ariz., ¶ 30 (App. 2013) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
- New Sundance v. Cutler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
New Sundance v. Cutler
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
of Ariz., ¶ 10 (App. 2013).
- Morales v. Hon coffey/state 535 P.3d 52 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Morales v. Hon coffey/state
535 P.3d 52
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
of Ariz., ¶ 25 (App. 2013) (quotation omitted), and the venue where the suit must be litigated
- Fiflis v. Cave Creek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Fiflis v. Cave Creek
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
of Ariz., –69 ¶ 22 (App. 2013).
- Fiflis v. Cave Creek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Fiflis v. Cave Creek
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
of Ariz., –69 ¶ 22 (App. 2013).
- Velazquez v. Fmz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Velazquez v. Fmz
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
of Ariz., ¶ 6 (App. 2013).
- Pettersen v. Plexus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Pettersen v. Plexus
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
of Ariz., ¶ 17 (App. 2013) (“When a complaint asserts a claim for declaratory relief, the court looks for affirmative conduct by a party that removes the claim from the realm of mere possibility and creates an actual controversy.” (internal quotation omitted)).
- Farnsworth v. Flagstaff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Farnsworth v. Flagstaff
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
of Ariz., ¶ 17 (App. 2013).
- Maricopa v. Rovey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Maricopa v. Rovey
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
of Ariz., ¶ 6 (App. 2013) (quoting Montaño v. Browning, ¶ 4 (App. 2002)).
- Mac Properties v. Dd Dunlap Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Mac Properties v. Dd Dunlap
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
of Ariz., ¶ 9 (App. 2013) ( ¶ 45 (App. 1998)).
- Tempe v. Sussex Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Tempe v. Sussex
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
of Ariz., -68, ¶ 17 (App. 2013).
- HSBC v. Cluff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
HSBC v. Cluff
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
of Ariz., ¶ 12 (App. 2013).
- Triyar v. Rem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Triyar v. Rem
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
of Ariz., ¶ 13 (App. 2013) (“A statute of limitations defense to a quiet title action turns on whether the claimant asserts a possessory interest in the land.”).
- Sussex v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Sussex v. Tempe
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
of Ariz., ¶ 30 (App. 2013); (In a quiet title action, the claimant “cannot recover on the weakness of his adversary’s title.”).
- Viniegra v. Town of Parker Municipal Property Corp. 383 P.3d 665 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Viniegra v. Town of Parker Municipal Property Corp.
383 P.3d 665
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
of Ariz., ¶ 26 (App. 2013) ().
- Stebbins v. Sullivan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Stebbins v. Sullivan
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
of Ariz., ¶ 17 (App. 2013).
- Florence v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Florence v. State
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
of Ariz., ¶ 27, (quoting Cullen v. Auto-Owners Ins.
- Schugg v. Az Brd of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Schugg v. Az Brd of Regents
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
BACKGROUND The relevant facts are undisputed, and are set forth briefly below, as well as within the separate but related opinion, Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of Arizona (Schugg I), ¶¶ 2-5, (review denied April 22, 2014).1 ABOR, as a subdivision of the State of Arizona, is a “public entity” for purposes of Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.)