Cited by

See Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Mgmt., Inc., (noting well-established rule that jury determines credibility and weight afforded to reliable expert testimony).

Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Mmgt, Inc., ¶ 24

Moreover, Rule 702 does not prohibit “the testimony of experience-based experts.” Id.; Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Mgmt., Inc., ¶ 14 (App. 2014) (citing the advisory committee note to Federal Rule 702: “Nothing in this amendment is intended to suggest that experience alone—or experience in conjunction with other knowledge, skill, training or education—may not provide a sufficient foundation for expert testimony”).

Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Mgmt., Inc., ¶ 7

Jurisdiction ¶6 Relying on Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Management, Inc., P.3d 168 (App. 2014), the State argues this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the superior court’s dismissal of the present case because Medley’s notice of appeal stated she was appealing from the “judgment entered in this action on the 16th day of October 2013.” The minute entry outlining the court’s denial o

DISCUSSION ¶10 We review the denial of a motion for new trial for an abuse of discretion; “the burden is on the party seeking to overturn the trial 3 BERKLEY et al. v. KOENIG Decision of the Court court’s judgment to show such an abuse.” Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Mgmt., Inc., ¶ 8