Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Marriage of Dougall, 316 P.3d 591.

26 citing documents.

  • Morgan v. Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Morgan v. Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    If a judgment is void, the superior court “has no discretion but to vacate it.” ¶ 12 (App. 2013) (citation omitted).
  • Mikalacki v. Rubezic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Mikalacki v. Rubezic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Potter v. Potter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Potter v. Potter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    ¶11 “A judgment or order is ‘void’ if the court entering it lacked jurisdiction: (1) over the subject matter, (2) over the person involved, or (3) to render the particular judgment or order entered.” ¶ 12 (App. 2013) ().
  • Brevetti v. Brevetti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Brevetti v. Brevetti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    ¶ 12 (App. 2013) (explaining judgments and orders are void if the court entering them lacks jurisdiction) (citation omitted).
  • Cota v. Keene Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Cota v. Keene Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Yee v. Yee 484 P.3d 650 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Yee v. Yee 484 P.3d 650 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    ¶ 9 (App. 2013); accord M & M Auto Storage Pool, Inc. v. Chem.
  • State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    §§ 12-120.21(A)(1) and -2101(A)(2) (2020).1 ¶ 9 (App. 2013) (noting denial of Rule 85 motion for relief from judgment “is appealable as a ‘special order made after final judgment’”) (quoting A.R.S.
  • State v. McEvoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. McEvoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    “[A] notice of appeal must be filed no later than thirty days after entry of the judgment or order from which the appeal is taken.” ¶ 7 (App. 2013); see also Ariz. R. Civ.
  • Greenham v. Hope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Greenham v. Hope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    -6, ¶ 9 (App. 2013) (denial of a motion made pursuant to Arizona Rule of Family Law Procedure 85(C) is appealable under § 12-2101(A)(2)).
  • Kostadinova v. Stephens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Kostadinova v. Stephens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    ¶ 9, n.5 (App. 2013) (“Wherever the language in [the Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure] is substantially the same as the language in other statewide rules, the case law interpreting that language will apply to these rules.”) (alteration in original) (quoting Ariz. R. Fam.
  • Razdan v. Razdan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Razdan v. Razdan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    ¶ 9 (App. 2013) (holding an order denying a motion for relief is appealable as a special order after final judgment) (citations omitted); -72, ¶¶ 5- 6 (App. 2012) (considering an appeal from a ruling on a petition to enforce 2 Absent material changes from the relevant dat
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    App. P. 9(a); ¶ 7, (providing that Rule 9(e) extends time to file a notice of appeal until after court rules on certain timely filed motions, including a motion pursuant to Arizona Rule of Family Law Procedure 83(A)).
  • Sandra Howell v. John Howell 361 P.3d 936 Ariz. 2015
  • Sandra Howell v. John Howell 361 P.3d 936 Ariz. 2015
    ¶ 19, 6 HOWELL V. HOWELL Opinion of the Court (deciding that nothing in § 25-530 prevented the court from considering VA disability benefits in determining the payment of arrearages stemming