DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite SVENDSEN v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 323 P.3d 1179.

65 citing documents.

  • Houston v. Azsbe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    § 12-913; see also Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014) (construing A.R.S.
  • Shudak v. Azcc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Shudak v. Azcc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    § 12-913 “has been construed as also allowing an appeal to the court of appeals, which was created after § 12-913 was enacted.” Svendsen v. Arizona Dept. of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
  • Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLC 380 P.3d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Zarco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLC 380 P.3d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    “Despite this allowance of an appeal to the ‘supreme court,’ the statute has been construed as also allowing an appeal to the court of appeals, which was created after § 12-913 was enacted.” Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., , 533 ¶ 13
  • State v. Zarco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    “Despite this allowance of an appeal to the ‘supreme court,’ the statute has been construed as also allowing an appeal to the court of appeals, which was created after § 12-913 was enacted.” Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
  • Sunrise v. Sallus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Sunrise v. Sallus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
  • Lincoln v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Lincoln v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
  • Shelton v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Shelton v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div., ¶ 13 (App. 2014).
  • Lipton v. Arizona Dental Board Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Lipton v. Arizona Dental Board Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    See Svendsen v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., ¶ 13, (section 12-913 construed as allowing court of appeals review though it says “supreme court”).