Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Baker v. Meyer, 346 P.3d 998.

76 citing documents.

McAvoy v. Logan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
McAvoy v. Logan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 10 (App. 2015) (citation omitted).
Mesa v. O'Connor 563 P.3d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Mesa v. O'Connor 563 P.3d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Pedroza v. Pedroza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Pedroza v. Pedroza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Windschill v. Windschill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Windschill v. Windschill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
§ 25-103(B); ¶ 12 (App. 2015).
Decormier v. Cormier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Decormier v. Cormier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Hustrulid v. Stakebake 516 P.3d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Hustrulid v. Stakebake 516 P.3d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Peralta v. Murray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Peralta v. Murray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ali v. Elsied Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ali v. Elsied Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 10 (App. 2015); ¶ 5 (App. 2016).
Alcott v. Killebrew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Alcott v. Killebrew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 7 (App. 2007); ¶ 7 (App. 2015) (“We review a parenting agreement de novo because it is incorporated into the dissolution decree and because it is ‘akin to a type of contractual agreement between the parties.’” (quoting Jordan, 221 Ariz. at 588, ¶ 15)).
Goss v. Goss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Goss v. Goss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
at 179; ¶ 10 (App. 2017), and defer to the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, ¶ 4 (App. 2018).
Daurio v. Daurio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Daurio v. Daurio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ball v. Ball 478 P.3d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ball v. Ball 478 P.3d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Wheeler v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Wheeler v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Maria v. v. Dcs, Z.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Maria v. v. Dcs, Z.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ward v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ward v. Ward Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Mother sought: 1 “We view the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision.” ¶ 2 (App. 2015).
Lewis v. Rehkow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lewis v. Rehkow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 10 (App. 2015); ¶ 7 (App. 2003).
10k LLC v. Wvsv Holdings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
10k LLC v. Wvsv Holdings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Russell v. Sahl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Russell v. Sahl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gonzales v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gonzales v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
which protect that right absent exceptional circumstances.” ¶ 6 (App. 2015) (quoting A.R.S.
Paul E. v. Courtney F. 418 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Paul E. v. Courtney F. 418 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Baker v. Meyer , , 116, ¶ 10, , 1002 (App. 2015).
Strong v. Owens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Strong v. Owens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Vanden Bosch v. Vanden Bosch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Vanden Bosch v. Vanden Bosch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
French v. Morin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
French v. Morin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Landry v. Landry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Landry v. Landry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 10 (App. 2015); Manuel M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Kazi v. Saleem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kazi v. Saleem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017