Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines, 366 P.3d 111.
-
Stromberg v. Heirigs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Owners Ass’n, ¶ 14 (App. 2016).
- Polyard v. Alattar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Polyard v. Alattar
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Owners Ass’n, ¶ 17 (App. 2016)
- S S Holdings v. American Green Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
S S Holdings v. American Green
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Owners Ass’n, ¶ 17 (App. 2016).
- Weigele v. Oliver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Weigele v. Oliver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Majerle v. Zimmerman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Majerle v. Zimmerman
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Owners Ass’n, ¶ 7 (App. 2016).
- Merrick v. Abec Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Merrick v. Abec
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Owners Ass’n v. McGovern, ¶ 16 (App. 2016).
- Lane-Jacobson v. Mercury Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Lane-Jacobson v. Mercury
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Owners Ass’n, ¶ 12 (App. 2016); Merkens v. Fed.
- Vangilder v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Vangilder v. Pinal County
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Owners Ass’n v. McGovern, ¶ 11 n.4 (App. 2016)).
- Barkley v. Icep Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Barkley v. Icep
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Owners Ass’n, ¶ 12 (App. 2016).
- Klarkowski v. Define Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Klarkowski v. Define
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Owners Ass’n, ¶ 12 10 KLARKOWSKI, et al. v. DEFINE, et al. Decision of the Court E. Recovery of Costs ¶26 Finally, DeFine challenges the superior court’s award of taxable costs to the Klarkowskis under A.R.S.
- Deutsche Bank v. Pheasant Grove 429 P.3d 558 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Deutsche Bank v. Pheasant Grove
429 P.3d 558
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Owners Ass’n, n.4 ¶ 11 (App. 2016).
- Chula Vista Homeowners Ass'n v. Irwin 426 P.3d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
-
Chula Vista Homeowners Ass'n v. Irwin
426 P.3d 1228
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Owners Ass'n v. McGovern , , ¶ 9, and that § 12-341.01 therefore permitted him to award the Olsons' their attorney fees.
- Peterson v. Surprise 418 P.3d 1020 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Peterson v. Surprise 418 P.3d 1020 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc. 396 P.3d 600 Ariz. 2017
-
American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.
396 P.3d 600
Ariz. 2017
Owners Ass’n, , 54-56 ¶¶ 7-14, -16 (App. 2016); (stating that when parties’ contract has a unilateral provision mandating attorney fee recovery for only one party, § 12-341.01 applies to the other, successful party’s claim for attorney fees and affords trial court discretion to award or deny fees under the statute)
- Jokobov v. Dekermendjian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Jokobov v. Dekermendjian
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Owners Ass’n, ¶ 13, (court can 1In support of their challenge to the superior court’s findings, the Dekermendjians also cite to materials included in an appendix to their opening brief.
- State v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
State v. Rivera
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Owners Ass’n, n.5, ¶ 15 (App. 2016) (-01 (1994)); Summers v. Gloor, --- P.3d ---, *5 n.6, ¶ 20 (App. 2016) ( ¶ 91 (App. 2007)).