Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc., 393 P.3d 946.
- McAvoy v. Logan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
McAvoy v. Logan
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Comm’n, (finding confession of error in answering brief that failed to respond to debatable issue); Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc. ¶ 12 n.5 (App. 2017) (declining to apply waiver for answering brief even though it did not cite to the record as required by ARCAP 13(b)).
- Alan v. Lober Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Alan v. Lober
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
–29, ¶¶ 5–22 (App. 2000) (wrongfully withholding disclosure was misconduct justifying grant of a new trial); Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., ¶¶ 14–19 (App. 2017) (counsel engaged in misconduct by repeatedly violating court’s orders on motions in limine); (misconduct includes counsel improperly vouching for witness’s credibility).
- Gaona v. Camacho Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Gaona v. Camacho
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., ¶ 3 (App. 2017) (presuming “missing transcript would support the [trial] court’s ruling”).
- Rabin v. McGhee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Rabin v. McGhee
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
v. Como, ¶ 31 (App. 2022); Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc., ¶ 3 (App. 2017).
- Borowsky v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Borowsky v. Brooks
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See, Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc.
- In Re Richard L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
In Re Richard L.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc., n.5 (App. 2017) (noting that waiver for failure to comply with ARCAP 13 is discretionary).
- Jf v. Hon. como/cf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Jf v. Hon. como/cf
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc., ¶ 3 (App. 2017).
- Allegra G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Allegra G. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., ¶ 12 n.5 (App. 2017).
- Wiltse v. Wiltse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Wiltse v. Wiltse
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., ¶ 12 n.5 (App. 2017).
- Reyes v. Gilbert 447 P.3d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Reyes v. Gilbert
447 P.3d 332
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
A trial court also abuses its discretion “when the record lacks substantial evidence to support the court’s finding.” Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2017) (-03, ¶ 12 (App. 2009)); ¶ 26 (2017) (“The appellate court’s role is to oversee the granting of new trials and to ensure that the exercise of a trial court’s broad discretion has a legal, rather than an ar
- Emilio v. vip/auto-owners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Emilio v. vip/auto-owners
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Varco, 4 EMILIO v. VIP/AUTO-OWNERS Decision of the Court Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2017).
- State v. Mullet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Mullet
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
the record lacks substantial evidence to support the court's finding.” Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2017)
- Clarritt v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Clarritt v. Scott
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc., 3 CLARRITT v. SCOTT Decision of the Court ¶9 Legal issues, including whether a decree is void or voidable and the interpretation of court rules, are reviewed de novo.
- Webb v. Farm Bureau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Webb v. Farm Bureau
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., n.5, ¶ 12 (App. 2017) (stating waiver for failure to comply with ARCAP 13(a) is discretionary); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (requiring that opening briefs present and address significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth the parties’ position on issues in quest