Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc., 393 P.3d 946.

28 citing documents.

  • McAvoy v. Logan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • McAvoy v. Logan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    Comm’n, (finding confession of error in answering brief that failed to respond to debatable issue); Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc. ¶ 12 n.5 (App. 2017) (declining to apply waiver for answering brief even though it did not cite to the record as required by ARCAP 13(b)).
  • Alan v. Lober Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Alan v. Lober Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    –29, ¶¶ 5–22 (App. 2000) (wrongfully withholding disclosure was misconduct justifying grant of a new trial); Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., ¶¶ 14–19 (App. 2017) (counsel engaged in misconduct by repeatedly violating court’s orders on motions in limine); (misconduct includes counsel improperly vouching for witness’s credibility).
  • Gaona v. Camacho Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Gaona v. Camacho Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    See Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., ¶ 3 (App. 2017) (presuming “missing transcript would support the [trial] court’s ruling”).
  • Rabin v. McGhee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Rabin v. McGhee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    v. Como, ¶ 31 (App. 2022); Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc., ¶ 3 (App. 2017).
  • Borowsky v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • Borowsky v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    See, Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc.
  • In Re Richard L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • In Re Richard L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    See Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc., n.5 (App. 2017) (noting that waiver for failure to comply with ARCAP 13 is discretionary).
  • Jf v. Hon. como/cf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Jf v. Hon. como/cf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc., ¶ 3 (App. 2017).
  • Allegra G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Allegra G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    See Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., ¶ 12 n.5 (App. 2017).
  • Wiltse v. Wiltse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Wiltse v. Wiltse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    See Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., ¶ 12 n.5 (App. 2017).
  • Reyes v. Gilbert 447 P.3d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Reyes v. Gilbert 447 P.3d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    A trial court also abuses its discretion “when the record lacks substantial evidence to support the court’s finding.” Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2017) (-03, ¶ 12 (App. 2009)); ¶ 26 (2017) (“The appellate court’s role is to oversee the granting of new trials and to ensure that the exercise of a trial court’s broad discretion has a legal, rather than an ar
  • Emilio v. vip/auto-owners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Emilio v. vip/auto-owners Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Varco, 4 EMILIO v. VIP/AUTO-OWNERS Decision of the Court Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2017).
  • State v. Mullet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Mullet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    the record lacks substantial evidence to support the court's finding.” Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., ¶ 12 (App. 2017)
  • Clarritt v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Clarritt v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc., 3 CLARRITT v. SCOTT Decision of the Court ¶9 Legal issues, including whether a decree is void or voidable and the interpretation of court rules, are reviewed de novo.
  • Webb v. Farm Bureau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Webb v. Farm Bureau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    See Varco, Inc. v. UNS Elec., Inc., n.5, ¶ 12 (App. 2017) (stating waiver for failure to comply with ARCAP 13(a) is discretionary); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (requiring that opening briefs present and address significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth the parties’ position on issues in quest