DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp., 752 P.2d 28.

28 citing documents.

  • Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa Inc 416 P.3d 824 Ariz. 2018
  • Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa Inc 416 P.3d 824 Ariz. 2018
    ¶29 “implicitly” recognizes a duty of care owed by landowners who release airborne asbestos fibers onto neighboring properties.
  • Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc. 382 P.3d 75 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc. 382 P.3d 75 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    carried by the wind onto neighboring property” P.2d 28 (App. 1987).
  • Wyckoff v. Mogollon Health Alliance 307 P.3d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
  • Wyckoff v. Mogollon Health Alliance 307 P.3d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
  • Vicki Pounders v. Enserch E&C Inc 306 P.3d 9 Ariz. 2013
  • Vicki Pounders v. Enserch E&C Inc 306 P.3d 9 Ariz. 2013
    – 78, –31 (App. 1987), she maintains that Arizona 4 POUNDERS V. ENSERCH Opinion of the Court does not recognize mere expo
  • Pounders v. ENSERCH E & C, INC. 276 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
  • Pounders v. ENSERCH E & C, INC. 276 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
    (deciding plaintiffs exposed to HIV-infected blood did not sustain a “bodily injury” entitling them to recover under an insurance policy because they suffered no resulting physical injury); -78 , -31 (App.1987) (concluding plaintiffs who inhaled asbestos fibers that changed lung tissue could not sue for increased risk of future asbestos-related disease or for distress caused by risk of future onset of disease before any disease becomes manifest).
  • Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood 98 P.3d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
  • Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood 98 P.3d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
    ¶ 81 In support of its conclusion
  • Monaco v. HealthPartners of Southern Arizona 995 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
  • Monaco v. HealthPartners of Southern Arizona 995 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
    ysical complications from which he continues to suffer residual pain, suffering, emotional distress, [and] mental anguish.” Before trial, appellants moved for summary judgment, arguing that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law because Monaco had not suffered sufficient bodily harm to sustain a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress
  • Gau v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. 901 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • Gau v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. 901 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
    “Transitory physical phenomena” such as weeping and insomnia “are not the type of bodily harm which would sustain a cause of action for emotional distress.” , , (permitting action for negligent infliction of emotional distress where plaintiff was a victim, not a bystander, and sustained minor physical injuries as well as significant emotional distress).
  • Myers v. Wood 850 P.2d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
  • Myers v. Wood 850 P.2d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
    (recurrent water damage from defectively designed water removal system); , (subsequent claim for damages not precluded by earlier claim arising from same tortious conduct); Bruce v. Froeb, 15 Ariz.App.
  • Transamerica Insurance v. Doe 840 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
  • Transamerica Insurance v. Doe 840 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
    -77 , -30 (App.1988), the plaintiffs, who resided in a mobile home park adjacent to an asbestos mill and tailings pile, were exposed to substantial quantities of airborne asbestos fiber.
  • Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp. 781 P.2d 1373 Ariz. 1989
  • Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp. 781 P.2d 1373 Ariz. 1989
  • Wilkie v. State 779 P.2d 1280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
  • Wilkie v. State 779 P.2d 1280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
    review granted in part and denied in part, April 26, 1988).
  • Burrington v. Gila County 767 P.2d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
  • Burrington v. Gila County 767 P.2d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
    Bischofshausen, Vasbinder and Luckie v. D.W.
  • Cothrun v. Schwartz 752 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
  • Cothrun v. Schwartz 752 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
    This case involves the *460 alleged asbestos contamination of a trailer park in Globe, Arizona, and rises from the same lawsuit which we previously had on appeal in Burns, et al. v. Jaquays Mining Corporation, et al.