Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Abril v. Harris, 754 P.2d 1353.

40 citing documents.

Salinas v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Salinas v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
("[A]n attorney against whom attorney's fees have been imposed can appeal from that part of the judgment affecting him.").
Takieh v. Banner Health Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Takieh v. Banner Health Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Lindgren v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Lindgren v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
–75, ¶¶ 76, 78 (App. 2009); –81 (App. 1987).
Chandler v. Chandler Improvement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Chandler v. Chandler Improvement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Grubb v. Thraikill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Grubb v. Thraikill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Riendeau v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., ¶ 4 (App. 2010) ().
Russell Piccoli v. O'Donnell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Russell Piccoli v. O'Donnell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
No. 8, ¶ 7, (-81, -56 (App. 1987)).
McA Financial Group, Ltd. v. Enterprise Bank & Trust 341 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
McA Financial Group, Ltd. v. Enterprise Bank & Trust 341 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
App. P. Wieman, 166 Ariz. at 284, 802 P.2d at 435 (attorney permitted to appeal attorney fee award imposed against him), (same).
Riendeau v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 225 P.3d 597 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Riendeau v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 225 P.3d 597 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Yet the nonparty in Wieman had indeed filed a notice of appeal “from „the Judgment entered against [him].‟” 166 Ariz. at 284, 802 P.2d at 435 (alteration in Wieman); (attorney included in notice of appeal).
AIDA RENTA TRUST v. Maricopa County 212 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
AIDA RENTA TRUST v. Maricopa County 212 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
(“The [fees] statute is not applicable to actions taken by him prior to its effective date.
Douglas v. Governing Board of Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8 210 P.3d 1275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Douglas v. Governing Board of Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8 210 P.3d 1275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Dowling v. Stapley 211 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Dowling v. Stapley 211 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Moedt v. General Motors Corp. 60 P.3d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Moedt v. General Motors Corp. 60 P.3d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-81 , -56 (App.1987) (A party is aggrieved if (1) interest is direct, substantial and immediate, (2) party would be benefitted by reversal of the judgment and (3) party’s pecuniary interest has been directly affected.); , (App.l
In re Radacosky 905 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
In re Radacosky 905 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
See generally Precision Components, Inc. v. Harrison, Harper, Christian & Dichter, P.C.
Lisa v. Strom 904 P.2d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Lisa v. Strom 904 P.2d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
(holding that a non-party attorney, against whom the trial court imposed attorney’s fees, had standing to appeal the judgment).
Precision Components v. Harrison, Harper 880 P.2d 1098 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Precision Components v. Harrison, Harper 880 P.2d 1098 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Matter of Levine 847 P.2d 1093 Ariz. 1993
Matter of Levine 847 P.2d 1093 Ariz. 1993
Rende v. State 812 P.2d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Rende v. State 812 P.2d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
(interpreting Rule 1, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure).
Wieman v. Roysden 802 P.2d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Wieman v. Roysden 802 P.2d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Barrow v. Arizona Board of Regents 761 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Barrow v. Arizona Board of Regents 761 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988