Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hoffman v. Greenberg, 767 P.2d 725.

44 citing documents.

Lincoln v. McDaniel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Lincoln v. McDaniel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
(“No cross-appeal was taken from the [superior] court’s denial of attorney’s fees.
ADVANTAGE POOL v. MILES Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
ADVANTAGE POOL v. MILES Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Mesquite v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Mesquite v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“The line between an appeal which has no merit and one which is frivolous is very fine, and we exercise our power to punish sparingly.”
State Guardiola v. Pennington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State Guardiola v. Pennington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Because she has not raised these issues in a cross-appeal, her request for affirmative relief from the judgment is not properly before us. See ARCAP 13(b)(2) (An appellate court may “modify a judgment to enlarge the rights of the appellee or reduce the rights of the appellant only if the appellee has filed a notice of cross-appeal.”)
Holmes v. Allens Auto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Holmes v. Allens Auto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Schreiner v. Schreiner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Schreiner v. Schreiner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Tsanos v. Zistatsis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Tsanos v. Zistatsis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
5 TSANOS, et al. v. ZISTATSIS, et al. Decision of the Court one which is frivolous is very fine, and we exercise our power to punish sparingly.”
Mary Anna Sotomayor v. Pauline Sotomayor-Munoz 370 P.3d 1126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Mary Anna Sotomayor v. Pauline Sotomayor-Munoz 370 P.3d 1126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
(“The line between an appeal which has no merit and one which is frivolous is very fine, and we exercise our power to punish sparingly.”).
Terterova v. byous/nestor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Terterova v. byous/nestor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“The line between an appeal which has no merit and one which is frivolous is very fine, and we exercise our power to punish sparingly.”).
Southwest Non-Profit Housing Corporation v. Nowak, Kniffen, Martell 322 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Southwest Non-Profit Housing Corporation v. Nowak, Kniffen, Martell 322 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
h; Sage, n.7, 209 P.3d at 174 n.7
Belen Loan Investors, LLC v. Myers, Baumgardner, Los Luna Highlands 296 P.3d 984 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Belen Loan Investors, LLC v. Myers, Baumgardner, Los Luna Highlands 296 P.3d 984 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
¶ 14, and concluded that because the instant case involved “speculative large-tract real estate investments,” BLI was “not in the narrow class of persons entitled to rely on the appraisal[s],” P.3d 346 (App. 2004), P.2d 725 (App. 1988).
Sage v. BLAGG APPRAISAL CO., LTD. 209 P.3d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Sage v. BLAGG APPRAISAL CO., LTD. 209 P.3d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
the superior court ruled that in these circumstances an appraiser owes no duty to a homebuyer and entered summary judgment in favor of Blagg.
Kuehn v. Stanley, Charter Funding, First Magnus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Kuehn v. Stanley, Charter Funding, First Magnus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
¶7 After oral argument, P.2d 725 (App. 1988), a case that analyzed a claim for damages resulting from a negligent appraisal under the law of negligent misrepresentation as stated in Restatement § 552.
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
at 189, 677 P.2d at 1297 10 ; -80, -28 (App. 1988); Western Technologies, 154 Ariz. at 3, 739 P.2d at 1318, 1320 (App.1986).
Little v. ALL PHOENIX S. COM. MENT. HLTH. 919 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Little v. ALL PHOENIX S. COM. MENT. HLTH. 919 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Little v. All Phoenix South Community Mental Health Center, Inc. 919 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Little v. All Phoenix South Community Mental Health Center, Inc. 919 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Berry v. Foster 883 P.2d 470 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Berry v. Foster 883 P.2d 470 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Case Power & Equipment Co. 876 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Case Power & Equipment Co. 876 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Tovrea v. Nolan 875 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Tovrea v. Nolan 875 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Rourk v. State 821 P.2d 273 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Rourk v. State 821 P.2d 273 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
(directed verdict); State ex rel.
Johnson v. Brimlow 791 P.2d 1101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Johnson v. Brimlow 791 P.2d 1101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Baich v. Campbell 791 P.2d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Baich v. Campbell 791 P.2d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990