Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Reed v. Gershweir, 772 P.2d 26.

30 citing documents.

Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(apparent agency), with Beeck v. Tucson Gen.
Benedict v. Total Transit Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Benedict v. Total Transit Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
By contrast, apparent authority arises when “the principal has intentionally or inadvertently induced third persons to believe that such a person was his agent although no actual or express authority was conferred on him as agent.”
Augee v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Augee v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Escareno, 239 Ariz. at 130, ¶ 8 (emphasis added) ( (App. 1989)).
Majerle v. Zimmerman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Majerle v. Zimmerman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
arises when ‘the principal has intentionally or inadvertently induced third persons to believe that such a person was [its] agent although no actual or express authority was conferred on him as agent.’”) ().
Metropolitan v. Crook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Metropolitan v. Crook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
W., L.L.C., ¶ 8 (App. 2016) ().
Turley v. Beus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Nguyen v. Nguyen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Nguyen v. Nguyen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
see also Anchor Equities, -67 (App. 1989).
Turley v. Beus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
arises when ‘the principal intentionally or inadvertently induce[s] third persons to believe [a particular] person was his agent although no actual or express authority was conferred on him as agent.’” Escareno, 239 Ariz. at 130, ¶ 8 ().
Escareno Ex Rel. Estate of Escareno v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. 366 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Escareno Ex Rel. Estate of Escareno v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. 366 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
6 ESCARENO v. KINDRED NURSING Opinion of the Court was his agent although no actual or express authority was conferred on him as agent.”
Jm Homes v. Empire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jm Homes v. Empire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(internal citations omitted).
Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C. 269 P.3d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C. 269 P.3d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Id.; , (“Apparent or ostensible authority may be defined as that *512 authority which the principal knowingly or negligently holds his agent out as possessing, or permits him to assume, under such circumstances as to estop the principal from denying its existence.”).
Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
11 , 204 n. 1, , 27 n. 1 (App.1989).
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
11 , 204 n. 1, , 27 n. 1 (App.1989).
Henry v. Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. 132 P.3d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Henry v. Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. 132 P.3d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Brown v. Arizona Department of Real Estate 890 P.2d 615 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Brown v. Arizona Department of Real Estate 890 P.2d 615 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Services Holding Co. v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance 883 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Services Holding Co. v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance 883 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994