Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Aldabbagh v. Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses & Control, 783 P.2d 1207.

55 citing documents.

Shubhrananda v. Earle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Shubhrananda v. Earle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Aldabbagh v. Ariz. Dep’t of Liquor Licenses & Control, (citations omitted).
Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. v. City of Tucson 381 P.3d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. v. City of Tucson 381 P.3d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Collateral estoppel requires, among other things, “a valid and final decision on the merits.” Aldabbagh v. Ariz. Dep’t of Liquor Licenses & Control, quoting Gilbert v. Bd.
Bozrah v. aroc/peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Bozrah v. aroc/peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Aldabbagh v. Ariz. Dep’t of Liquor Licenses & Control, -18 (App. 1989).
Demaree v. Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Demaree v. Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
at ¶ 9; Aldabbagh v. Ariz. Dep’t of Liquor Licenses & Control
Anderson v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Anderson v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Insufficiency of Appellants’ Pleadings under the Equal Privileges and Immunities Clause and the Special Laws Clause ¶25 When evaluating the City’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, “well-pleaded material allegations of the complaint are taken as admitted.” See Aldabbagh v. Ariz. Dep’t of Liquor Licenses & Control
Kost v. Aroc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kost v. Aroc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Aldabbagh v. Ariz. Dep’t of Liquor Licenses & Control, -18, -10 (App. 1989).
Wolfson v. B of a Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Wolfson v. B of a Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Aldabbagh v. Arizona Dep’t of Liquor Licenses & Control
Scenic Arizona v. City of Phoenix Board of Adjustment 268 P.3d 370 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Scenic Arizona v. City of Phoenix Board of Adjustment 268 P.3d 370 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
415, 417, (When reviewing a motion to dismiss, “the well-pleaded material allegations of the complaint are taken as admitted, but conclusions of law or unwarranted deductions of fact are not.”).
YUMA VALLEY LAND CO., LLC v. City of Yuma 256 P.3d 625 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
YUMA VALLEY LAND CO., LLC v. City of Yuma 256 P.3d 625 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Aldabbagh v. Ariz. Dep’t of Liquor Licenses & Control
Sensing v. Harris 172 P.3d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Sensing v. Harris 172 P.3d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
“When testing a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, well-pleaded material allegations of the complaint are taken as admitted, but conclusions of law or unwarranted deductions of fact are not.” Aldabbagh v. Ariz. Dep’t of Liquor Licenses and Control
Cullen v. Koty-Leavitt Insurance Agency, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Cullen v. Koty-Leavitt Insurance Agency, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
See Aldabbagh v. Ariz. Dep’t of Liquor Licenses & Control, (“When testing a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, well-pleaded material allegations of the complaint are taken as admitted, but conclusions of law or unwarranted deductions of fact are not.”).
Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano 160 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano 160 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
We review questions of law de novo and “resolve all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiffs.” ¶ 5 , Aldabbagh v. Ariz. Dep’t of Liquor Licenses & Control, -18 , -10 (App.1989).
Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING 120 P.3d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING 120 P.3d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
See, e.g., Aldabbagh v. Ariz. Dep't of Liquor Licenses & Control, , ("injurious falsehood is the publication of matter derogatory to the plaintiff's business ...
McDonald v. City of Prescott 5 P.3d 900 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
McDonald v. City of Prescott 5 P.3d 900 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Wigglesworth v. Mauldin 990 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Wigglesworth v. Mauldin 990 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
See Aldabbagh v. Arizona Dep’t of Liquor Licenses and Control
Hansson v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners 985 P.2d 551 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Hansson v. Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners 985 P.2d 551 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
“Equal protection of the law guarantees like treatment to all persons who are similarly situated.” Aldabbagh v. Arizona Dep’t of Liquor Licenses and Control, , (citation omitted).
Johnson International, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 967 P.2d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Johnson International, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 967 P.2d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
section 12-341.01: DISCUSSION ¶ 19 When reviewing a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, this court looks to “whether the complaint, construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, sufficiently sets forth a valid claim.”
Russell v. Royal MacCabees Life Insurance 974 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Russell v. Royal MacCabees Life Insurance 974 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Aldabbagh v. Arizona Dep’t of Liquor Licenses & Control
Hafner v. Beck 916 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Hafner v. Beck 916 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
“Questions of law decided by the trial court are reviewed de novo.” Aldabbagh v. Arizona Dept. of Liquor Licenses & Control
Nelson v. Phoenix Resort Corp. 888 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Nelson v. Phoenix Resort Corp. 888 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Aldabbagh v. Arizona Dep’t of Liquor Licenses & Control
Norriega v. MacHado 878 P.2d 1386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Norriega v. MacHado 878 P.2d 1386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Apache County 831 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Apache County 831 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Aldabbagh v. Arizona Dep’t of Liquor Licenses & Control
Do by Minker v. Farmers Ins. Co. 828 P.2d 1254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Do by Minker v. Farmers Ins. Co. 828 P.2d 1254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
McCready v. McCready 810 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
McCready v. McCready 810 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Estate of Aten v. City of Tucson 817 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Appels-Meehan v. Appels 805 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991