Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ethridge v. Arizona State Board of Nursing, 796 P.2d 899.

29 citing documents.

Stinnett v. Az Vmeb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Stinnett v. Az Vmeb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
of Nursing, (“The term ‘unprofessional conduct’ is a sufficient directive to guide the Board in its exercise of the delegated discretion.”); Webb v. State ex rel.
Cobia v. Abon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cobia v. Abon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Johnson v. Acc 438 P.3d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Johnson v. Acc 438 P.3d 656 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
of Nursing, –05 (App. 1989); see Phelps Dodge, 207 Ariz. at 112–13, ¶ 59 (stating that, although the court must read empowering statutes narrowly, a statutory grant of authority may be found 9 JOHNSON v. ACC, et al. Opinion of the
State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewit 399 P.3d 663 Ariz. 2017
McGovern v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration 384 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
McGovern v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration 384 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Arizona Commercial Diving Services, Inc. v. Applied Diving Services, Inc. 129 P.3d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Arizona Commercial Diving Services, Inc. v. Applied Diving Services, Inc. 129 P.3d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc. 83 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc. 83 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Smith v. Arizona Long Term Care System 84 P.3d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Smith v. Arizona Long Term Care System 84 P.3d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Webb v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Bd. of Medical Examiners 48 P.3d 505 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Webb v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Bd. of Medical Examiners 48 P.3d 505 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
3613 Ltd. v. Department of Liquor Licenses & Control 978 P.2d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
3613 Ltd. v. Department of Liquor Licenses & Control 978 P.2d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
of Nursing, -05 , -07 (App.1989) (citations omitted).
Romo v. Kirschner 889 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Romo v. Kirschner 889 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Siegel v. Arizona State Liquor Board 807 P.2d 1136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Siegel v. Arizona State Liquor Board 807 P.2d 1136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
STANDARDS OF REVIEW Where there is an appeal of an administrative board’s decision pursuant to the Administrative Review Act, the superi- or court determines whether the administrative action was illegal, arbitrary, capricious
Alexander v. Fund Manager, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System 804 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Alexander v. Fund Manager, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System 804 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
of Nursing, , DeGroot v. Arizona Racing Comm’n
Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc. 807 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc. 807 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
DeGroot v. Arizona Racing Comm’n
Bucciarelli v. Arizona Department of Transportation 800 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Bucciarelli v. Arizona Department of Transportation 800 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Ethridge v. *70 Arizona State Board of Nursing