Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Hughes v. Creighton, 798 P.2d 403.
- Green v. Rhoads Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Green v. Rhoads Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Thomas v. Caldwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Thomas v. Caldwell
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 7 (App. 2015) (recognizing that the superior court’s authority to grant nonparent visitation rights is “purely statutory” and governed by § 25-409); (noting that parents can preclude visitation by nonparents who do not have statutorily granted rights to such visits).
- Egan v. Fridlund-Horne 211 P.3d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-
Egan v. Fridlund-Horne
211 P.3d 1213
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See Finch v. O’Toole, -07 , -27 (1994); , (prior to enactment of § 25-415, holding that a former boyfriend could not seek visitation rights to the child even though he stood in loco parentis).
- Sheehan v. Flower 170 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
-
Sheehan v. Flower
170 P.3d 288
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Finck v. O’Toole, , , (“A common usage of the term parent is one who begets offspring”); Sailes v. Jones, 17 Ariz.App.
- Riepe v. Riepe 91 P.3d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- Rashedi v. General Board of Church of the Nazarene 54 P.3d 349 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
- Rashedi v. General Board of Church of the Nazarene 54 P.3d 349 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
- Thomas v. Thomas 49 P.3d 306 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
- Thomas v. Thomas 49 P.3d 306 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
- TWE Retirement Fund Trust v. Ream 8 P.3d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- TWE Retirement Fund Trust v. Ream 8 P.3d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- Forum Development, L.C. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 961 P.2d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- Forum Development, L.C. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 961 P.2d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- Encinas v. Pompa 939 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- Encinas v. Pompa 939 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
- Antonsen v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY OF MARICOPA 918 P.2d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
Antonsen v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY OF MARICOPA
918 P.2d 203
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
See, , (appeal from visitation order in paternity action); , (husband challenged paternity testing on direct appeal in dissolution action); R.A.J.
- Finck v. O'Toole 880 P.2d 624 Ariz. 1994
-
Finck v. O'Toole
880 P.2d 624
Ariz. 1994
The court of appeals disagreed with the analysis of Bryan and, instead, , , controlling.
- In Re the Marriage of Crawford 884 P.2d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
- In Re the Marriage of Crawford 884 P.2d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
- Finck v. Superior Court 868 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-
Finck v. Superior Court
868 P.2d 1000
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(trial court does have jurisdiction to award visitation to a stepparent) , (trial court does not have jurisdiction to award custody [or visitation] to a stepparent); , (trial court does not have jurisdiction to award visitation to an in loco parentis boyfriend).
- Marriage of Fenn v. Fenn 847 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
Marriage of Fenn v. Fenn
847 P.2d 129
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
: The court’s authority [to order child support] ...
- Bucciarelli v. Arizona Department of Transportation 800 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
- Bucciarelli v. Arizona Department of Transportation 800 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990