Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Lee Development Co. v. Papp, 803 P.2d 464.

38 citing documents.

Sammons v. Keaggy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sammons v. Keaggy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(stating this court will imply any additional finding necessary to sustain a judgment if it is reasonably supported by the evidence).
Pipher v. Loo 212 P.3d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Pipher v. Loo 212 P.3d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-76 , -69 (App.1990) (stating every judgment impliedly contains any additional findings or conclusions of law necessary to sustain it, if reasonably supported by the evidence and not in conflict with the express findings).
Riepe v. Riepe 91 P.3d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Riepe v. Riepe 91 P.3d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Turner 2 P.3d 1276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Followed Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Turner 2 P.3d 1276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
-76 , -69 (1990).(3) Granting or denying injunctive relief rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, Financial Associates, Inc. v. Hub Properties, Inc., , as does the grant or denial of attorneys’ fees.
Enterprise Leasing Co. of Phoenix v. Ehmke 3 P.3d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Followed Enterprise Leasing Co. of Phoenix v. Ehmke 3 P.3d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
we review questions of law de novo.
MacK v. Cruikshank 2 P.3d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
MacK v. Cruikshank 2 P.3d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Beijer v. ADAMS EX REL. COUNTY OF COCONINO 993 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Beijer v. ADAMS EX REL. COUNTY OF COCONINO 993 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Johnson v. Elson 967 P.2d 1022 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Johnson v. Elson 967 P.2d 1022 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Young 985 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Young 985 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
-76 , -69 (App.1990); see also Ariz. R. Civ.
Marriage of Muchesko v. Muchesko 955 P.2d 21 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Marriage of Muchesko v. Muchesko 955 P.2d 21 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Byers 942 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Byers 942 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Maricopa County 916 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Followed Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Maricopa County 916 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Baker v. Baker 900 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Baker v. Baker 900 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Brink Electric Construction Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 909 P.2d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Brink Electric Construction Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 909 P.2d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Capitano v. State 875 P.2d 832 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Capitano v. State 875 P.2d 832 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Tucson Mechanical Contracting, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 854 P.2d 1162 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Tucson Mechanical Contracting, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 854 P.2d 1162 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See Federoff v. Pioneer Title & Trust Co. of Arizona
McNeel v. McNeel 818 P.2d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
McNeel v. McNeel 818 P.2d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Tovrea Land and Cattle Co., v. Linsenmeyer, , -76 , -69 (App.1990).
Gila County Juvenile Action No. DEL-6325 v. Duber 816 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Gila County Juvenile Action No. DEL-6325 v. Duber 816 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Tempe Corporate Office Building v. Arizona Funding Services, Inc. 807 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Tempe Corporate Office Building v. Arizona Funding Services, Inc. 807 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991