Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Nichols v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 857 P.2d 406.

26 citing documents.

Date Street v. Farmers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Date Street v. Farmers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Brazee-Revocable Trust v. Phz-Msc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Brazee-Revocable Trust v. Phz-Msc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Co., (a contract “must be read as a whole in order to give a reasonable and harmonious meaning and effect to all of its provisions”) (citation omitted).
Goldberger v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Goldberger v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Co., (“A contract of insurance .
Mfc v. Gray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mfc v. Gray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co., (quoting Droz v. Paul Revere Life Ins.
Grimsland v. Jarrin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Grimsland v. Jarrin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co., (when we review a contract, it “must be read as a whole in order to give a reasonable and harmonious meaning and effect to all of its provisions.”).
Pachtman v. Pachtman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Pachtman v. Pachtman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co., (citation omitted) (internal quotation 2 PACHTMAN v. PACHTMAN Decision of the Court marks omitted).
CNL Hotels & Resorts, Inc. v. Maricopa County 244 P.3d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
CNL Hotels & Resorts, Inc. v. Maricopa County 244 P.3d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co., , (holding that a contract must be “read as a whole in order to give a reasonable and harmonious meaning and effect to all of its provisions” (citation omitted)).
Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Weitz Co. 158 P.3d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Weitz Co. 158 P.3d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood 98 P.3d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood 98 P.3d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Co., , quoting Droz v. Paul Revere Life Ins.
American Family Mutual Insurance v. White 65 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
American Family Mutual Insurance v. White 65 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 975 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 975 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
see also Nichols v. State Farm Fire & Cos. Co.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Arrington 963 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Arrington 963 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Co., , (each part of an insurance contract “must be read and interpreted in connection with all other parts” to give reasonable and harmonious meaning and effect to all provisions).
State v. Pinto 880 P.2d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Pinto 880 P.2d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by