Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Prudential v. Estate of Rojo-Pacheco, 962 P.2d 213.

36 citing documents.

Date Street Capital, LLC v. Clearcover Insurance Company ... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
Date Street Capital, LLC v. Clearcover Insurance Company ... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
(Vehicle Insurance and Financial Responsibility Act “mandates coverage following an accident with injuries or damage notwithstanding the insurer’s inability to discover fraudulent representations made in the insurance application”); -45 (App. 1997) (limiting Watford to “minimum coverage limits mandated by” § 28-4009).
Young v. Rose 286 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Young v. Rose 286 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
(“We presume that when the legislature enacts a statute, it is aware of existing statutes, and [w]here a later statute does not expressly repeal a former one, they should be construed so as to give effect to each, if possible.”) (internal quotation marks omitted).
State Ex Rel. Goddard v. WESTERN UNION FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. 166 P.3d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State Ex Rel. Goddard v. WESTERN UNION FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. 166 P.3d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
“Statutory provisions are to be read in the context of the overall statutory scheme.” , 962 * (quoting Goulder n Arizona Dept. of Transp., Motor Vehicle Din, , ).
Yarbrough v. Montoya-Paez 147 P.3d 755 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Yarbrough v. Montoya-Paez 147 P.3d 755 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Our goal is “to give full effect to each statute, if possible.” , 148—49, -23 (App.1997); accord Ariz. Gunite Builders v. Continental Cas.
Johnson v. Earnhardt's Gilbert Dodge, Inc. 111 P.3d 417 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Johnson v. Earnhardt's Gilbert Dodge, Inc. 111 P.3d 417 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Co. v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n., , 607 ¶ 15, , (We review a specific statute in the context of its overall statutory scheme “with the goal of achieving consistency among related provisions.”).
Grand Canyon Trust v. Arizona Corp. Commission 107 P.3d 356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Grand Canyon Trust v. Arizona Corp. Commission 107 P.3d 356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Co. v. Ariz. Corp. Comm’n, ¶ 15 , , (reviewing specific statute in the context of its overall statutory scheme with the goal of achieving consistency among related provisions).
Arizona-American Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 98 P.3d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Arizona-American Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 98 P.3d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
(statutes are to be read in context of related provisions).
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
are properly legislative, not judicial, tasks”); (“[I]t is for the legislature, not this court, to evaluate and balance competing policy considerations that bear on these issues and to make any necessary changes in this area.”).
Washburn v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Washburn v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Downs v. Scheffler 80 P.3d 775 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Downs v. Scheffler 80 P.3d 775 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
¶ 14 As we have already observed, we interpret § 25-415 in the context of the overall statutory scheme regulating custody “with the goal of achieving consistency among related provisions.” Thomas, 203 Ariz. at 37, ¶ 15 , 49 P.3d at 309 ( , ).
Commitment of Olin Gene Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
In Re the Commitment of Taylor 78 P.3d 1076 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
In Re the Commitment of Taylor 78 P.3d 1076 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
-49 , -23 (App. 1997) (citations omitted), quoting Goulder v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., , 416, , 999 (App.1993), aff'd
Commitment of Olin Gene Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
-49, -23 (App. 1997) (citations omitted), quoting Goulder v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., aff’d P.2d 280 (1994).
Thomas v. Thomas 49 P.3d 306 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Thomas v. Thomas 49 P.3d 306 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Allstate Insurance v. Universal Underwriters, Inc. 17 P.3d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Allstate Insurance v. Universal Underwriters, Inc. 17 P.3d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT 3 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT 3 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Agans v. Barnd 998 P.2d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Agans v. Barnd 998 P.2d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Lavidas v. Smith 987 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Lavidas v. Smith 987 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Young 985 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Young 985 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by