Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Zuern v. Ford Motor Co., 937 P.2d 676.

28 citing documents.

Waterford v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Waterford v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-92 (App. 1996) (explaining causation “is a necessary condition precedent to consideration of a person’s fault—i.e., the fault must have ‘proximately caus[ed] or contribut[ed]’ to the claimant’s injuries to be considered”) (quoting A.R.S.
Orosco v. McShcd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Orosco v. McShcd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
§ 12-2506(B) does not "require limiting liability by apportioning damages but by apportioning fault"); -92 (App. 1996).
Courtney Cramer v. Hon. Starr/ munguia/bejarano 375 P.3d 69 Ariz. 2016
Courtney Cramer v. Hon. Starr/ munguia/bejarano 375 P.3d 69 Ariz. 2016
¶ 10, (observing that “the causation element is factored in as ‘a necessary condition precedent to consideration of a person’s fault’ under [UCATA]”) ( ).
Robert Fleming v. State of Arizona, Az. Dept. of Public Safety, Gallivan 337 P.3d 1192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Robert Fleming v. State of Arizona, Az. Dept. of Public Safety, Gallivan 337 P.3d 1192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
(trial court did not err in admitting evidence bearing on party’s degree of fault, including evidence of intoxication).
hertz/coy v. Coy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
hertz/coy v. Coy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(affirming exclusion of an expert opinion on an alternate theory disclosed more than three months after the disclosure deadline); accord Wong v. Regents of Univ.
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Premier Manufactured Systems, Inc. 172 P.3d 410 Ariz. 2007
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Premier Manufactured Systems, Inc. 172 P.3d 410 Ariz. 2007
(noting that because UCATA “expressly defines ‘fault’ to include ‘strict liability,’ all of the different types of fault identified in that section, if contributing to the same injury, must be compared ...
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Premier Manufactured Systems, Inc. 142 P.3d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Premier Manufactured Systems, Inc. 142 P.3d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
-92 , -82 (App.1996) (quoting A.R.S.
Waddell v. Titan Ins. Co., Inc. 88 P.3d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Waddell v. Titan Ins. Co., Inc. 88 P.3d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Similarly, -89 , -79 (App.1996), the belated disclosure of a new theory of liability was not made until one month before trial and more than three months after the deadline for disclosing expert opinions.
West v. State 58 P.3d 28 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
West v. State 58 P.3d 28 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
quoting Cleveland By and Through Cleveland v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 890 F.2d 1540 , 1551 (10th Cir.1989)
Harvest v. Craig 48 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Harvest v. Craig 48 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Cohen v. Barnard, Vogler & Co. 13 P.3d 758 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Cohen v. Barnard, Vogler & Co. 13 P.3d 758 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Larsen v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. 978 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Larsen v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. 978 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
§ 12-2506 , and whether Arizona’s system of assessing liability for damages based on the trier of facts’ allocation of fault under § 12-2506 violates article 2, § 31 of the Arizona Constitution.
Piner v. Superior Court in and for County of Maricopa 962 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1998
Piner v. Superior Court in and for County of Maricopa 962 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1998
See, e.g., Hutcherson v. City of Phoenix, 1998 WL 351098 (Ariz.1998); , (causation of injury is a condition precedent to but different from allocation of fault for the accident; once causation of injury is determined, the factfinder must apportion fault between all parties and non-parties pursuant to § 12-2506(0)).
Zuern v. Ford Motor Co. 951 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1997
Zuern v. Ford Motor Co. 951 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1997