Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Cervantes v. Rijlaarsdam, 949 P.2d 56.
-
NOVALIS-MARINE v. MONASH
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶8 We review both evidentiary rulings and denial of a mistrial for abuse of discretion and “will not reverse unless unfair prejudice resulted or the court incorrectly applied the law.” ¶ 6 (App. 2000) (citation modified)
- Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Benedict v. Total Transit Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Benedict v. Total Transit Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Blaser v. Kaiser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Blaser v. Kaiser
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Comm’n v. Ryckman, ¶ 11 (App. 2001)); (motion for mistrial) (citing E.L.
- Wetherilt v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Wetherilt v. Moore
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Even assuming the language of Rule 411 applies to prohibit Moore from testifying about Harvey’s insurance, “Rule 411 specifically applies to ‘insurance against liability,’ and does not mention [property or other] insurance.”
- Ritchie v. Krasner 211 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Ritchie v. Krasner 211 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Brethauer v. General Motors Corp. 211 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Brethauer v. General Motors Corp. 211 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
-
Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
¶8 In addition, although we review a trial court’s evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion, Safeway’s pretrial motion raised a purely legal issue that is subject to our de novo review and that is not dependent on evidence adduced at trial.
- Acuna v. Hampton And Kroack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
-
Acuna v. Hampton And Kroack
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
36, (when trial court has refused to interfere in jury’s determination of damages, appellate court will interpose its own judgment only if convinced that verdict is so excessive as to suggest it was based on passion or prejudice); see also Sheppard v. Crow-Barker Paul No. 1 Ltd. P’ship
- Orfaly, George, Albrecht, Reid v. Tucson Symphony Society... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
-
Orfaly, George, Albrecht, Reid v. Tucson Symphony Society...
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
(ruling on motion for new trial reviewed for clear abuse of discretion); Delbridge v. Salt River Project Agric.
- Yauch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 10 P.3d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
- Yauch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 10 P.3d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
- Kuhn v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center 984 P.2d 551 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- Kuhn v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center 984 P.2d 551 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- Sheppard v. Crow-Barker-Paul No. 1 Ltd. Partnership 968 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-
Sheppard v. Crow-Barker-Paul No. 1 Ltd. Partnership
968 P.2d 612
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Davis v. Marquardt, 20 Ariz.App.