Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., 965 P.2d 47.

169 citing documents.

Morgan AZ Financial, L.L.C. v. Gotses 326 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 8 , (“On appeal from a summary judgment, we must determine de novo ...
Guerra v. State 323 P.3d 765 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Guerra v. State 323 P.3d 765 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
"On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we view all facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 2
Yanni, Thompson, Gunderson, Sayegh v. Tucker Plumbing, Inc., Brewer Enterprises, Inc. 312 P.3d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Yanni, Thompson, Gunderson, Sayegh v. Tucker Plumbing, Inc., Brewer Enterprises, Inc. 312 P.3d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
“‘On appeal from summary judgment, we must determine de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in applying the law.’” Miidas Greenhouses, LLC v. Global Horticultural, Inc., quoting Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., 965 4At the same time, the trial court denied Yanni’s cross-motion for summary judgment.
Gilbert Tuscany Lender, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank 307 P.3d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Gilbert Tuscany Lender, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank 307 P.3d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
"fW]e view all facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party against whom [summary] judgment was entered.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 2
Gorman v. Pima County 287 P.3d 800 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Gorman v. Pima County 287 P.3d 800 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
Grubb v. Do It Best Corporation 279 P.3d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Grubb v. Do It Best Corporation 279 P.3d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
“On appeal from a summary judgment, we must determine de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in applying the law.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., (emphasis omitted).
Kaz Construction, Inc v. Sierra Cobre Estates, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Kaz Construction, Inc v. Sierra Cobre Estates, LLC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
“On appeal from a summary judgment, we must determine de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in applying the law.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
Dayka & Hackett, LLC v. Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A., Inc. 269 P.3d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Dayka & Hackett, LLC v. Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A., Inc. 269 P.3d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
“On appeal from a summary judgment, we must determine de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in applying the law.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
Allstate Utility Construction, LLC v. Towne Bank 263 P.3d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Allstate Utility Construction, LLC v. Towne Bank 263 P.3d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., 316, ¶¶2, 8 , 50 (App.1998).
Continental Lighting & Contracting, Inc. v. Premier Grading & Utilities, LLC 258 P.3d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Continental Lighting & Contracting, Inc. v. Premier Grading & Utilities, LLC 258 P.3d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
“On appeal from a summary judgment, we must determine de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in applying the law.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
Villa De Jardines Ass'n v. Flagstar Bank, FSB 253 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Villa De Jardines Ass'n v. Flagstar Bank, FSB 253 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Background ¶ 2 “On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we view all facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
Mudas Greenhouses, LLC v. Global Horticultural, Inc. 244 P.3d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Mudas Greenhouses, LLC v. Global Horticultural, Inc. 244 P.3d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
*144 Background ¶2 “On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we view all facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
Thompson v. Pima County 243 P.3d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Thompson v. Pima County 243 P.3d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
Hamill v. Mid-Century Insurance Company Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Hamill v. Mid-Century Insurance Company Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
“On appeal from a summary judgment, we must determine de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in applying the law.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., (italics removed).
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Vasquez v. State 206 P.3d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Background ¶ 2 “On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we view all facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
Lowe v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Lowe v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
See Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
La Canada Hills Limited Partnership v. Florence Kite Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
La Canada Hills Limited Partnership v. Florence Kite Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
“On appeal from a summary judgment, we must determine de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in applying the law.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
“We are not bound by [the parties’ assertion,] however, because of this court’s independent duty to determine whether we have jurisdiction.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., n.2, n.2 (App. 1998)
Robson Ranch Quail Creek, LLC v. Pima County 161 P.3d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Robson Ranch Quail Creek, LLC v. Pima County 161 P.3d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
See Stein v. Sonus USA, Inc., (applicability of statute reviewed de novo); Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., (propriety of summary judgment reviewed de novo).
Aranda v. Cardenas, M.D. Nes Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Aranda v. Cardenas, M.D. Nes Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
whether the trial court erred in applying the law.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., see also Am.
In Re the Estate of ELLIOT GOLDMAN 158 P.3d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
In Re the Estate of ELLIOT GOLDMAN 158 P.3d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
BACKGROUND ¶2 Although the pertinent facts apparently are undisputed, on appeal from a summary judgment, “we view all facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
Airfreight Express, Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Airfreight Express, Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
“On appeal from a summary judgment, we must determine de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in applying the law.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
Hall v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
City of Bisbee v. Arizona Water Company Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Hall v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
City of Bisbee v. Arizona Water Company Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
David Contreras, Sr. v. Walgreens Drug Store 3837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
David Contreras, Sr. v. Walgreens Drug Store 3837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
“On appeal from a summary judgment, we must determine de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in applying the law.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.
Tritschler v. Allstate Insurance Co., Better Way Services Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006