Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Whiteco Outdoor Advertising v. City of Tucson, 972 P.2d 647.

28 citing documents.

Shao v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Shao v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
v. City of Tucson, –17 ¶ 7 (App. 1998).
Silk v. Blodgett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Silk v. Blodgett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
v. City of Tucson, ¶ 7 (App. 1998); see also Wade v. Ariz. St.
Nova v. Mesa Board Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Nova v. Mesa Board Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. City of Tucson, ¶ 7 (App. 1998).
Novak v. Fountain Hills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Novak v. Fountain Hills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. City of Tucson, ¶ 12 (App. 1998) (concluding that a municipal ordinance governing the placement of lighting fixtures was not a zoning ordinance subject to A.R.S.
Foor v. Smith 416 P.3d 858 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Foor v. Smith 416 P.3d 858 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
v. City of Tucson , , 316-17, , 649-50 (App. 1998).
Silver v. Pueblo Del Sol Water Co. 384 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
McGovern v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration 384 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
McGovern v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration 384 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. City of Tucson, ¶ 7, (citation omitted).
Silver v. Pueblo Del Sol Water Co. 384 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 7, (quoting Murphy v. Town of Chino 9 ).
Pawn 1st, LLC v. City of Phoenix 373 P.3d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Pawn 1st, LLC v. City of Phoenix 373 P.3d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. City of Tucson, –17, ¶ 7 (App. 1998).
Foor v. Hon. smith/phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Foor v. Hon. smith/phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
v. City of Tucson, -17, ¶ 7, -50 (App. 1998).
Richard E. Lambert, Ltd. v. City of Tucson Dept. of Procurement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Richard E. Lambert, Ltd. v. City of Tucson Dept. of Procurement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
v. City of Tucson, (appellate court bound by board’s factual findings); (we affirm administrative decision if supported by credible evidence); see also Special Fund Div. v. Indus.
Jones v. County of Coconino 35 P.3d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Jones v. County of Coconino 35 P.3d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
v. City of Tucson, , 316-17 ¶ 7, -50 (App.1998)
City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc. 32 P.3d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc. 32 P.3d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
v. City of Tucson, -17, ¶ 7 , -50 (App.1998).
Files v. Bernal 22 P.3d 57 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Files v. Bernal 22 P.3d 57 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Eller Media Co. v. City of Tucson 7 P.3d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Eller Media Co. v. City of Tucson 7 P.3d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Facts and Procedural History ¶2 A

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by