Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bazzanella v. Tucson City Court, 988 P.2d 157.

26 citing documents.

Samuel Fuentes v. Tucson City Court Hon. Jay Cranshaw 541 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
Samuel Fuentes v. Tucson City Court Hon. Jay Cranshaw 541 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
McMichael-gombar v. Phoenix Civil Service Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
McMichael-gombar v. Phoenix Civil Service Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“We conduct a bifurcated review of an appeal taken from a non-statutory special action initiated in the superior court.” ¶ 2 (App. 2001) ().
Dennison v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dennison v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sun City v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sun City v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Although we are sympathetic to the dissent’s reservations regarding the origins of this extreme deference, we are “bound by the decisions of our supreme court and must apply the law it has declared.” ¶ 21 (App. 2015) ( ¶ 8 (App. 1999)).
Yokois v. Adc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Yokois v. Adc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 3 (App. 1999) (citation omitted).
Valer C. Austin v. Josiah T. Austin 348 P.3d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Valer C. Austin v. Josiah T. Austin 348 P.3d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Foor v. Hon. smith/phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Foor v. Hon. smith/phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State of Arizona v. Cooperman 282 P.3d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
State of Arizona v. Cooperman 282 P.3d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Bazzanella v. Tucson City Court, 195 Ariz. 372, ¶ 3
Derendal v. Griffith 104 P.3d 147 Ariz. 2005
Derendal v. Griffith 104 P.3d 147 Ariz. 2005
Compare Strohson, P.2d 1251 (holding that misdemeanor assault classified as domestic violence is not a crime of moral 20 turpitude), P.2d 157 (App. 1999) (finding misdemeanor child abuse not a crime of moral turpitude), P.2d 48 (App. 1978) (holding that misdemeanor shoplifting is a crime of moral turpitude), P.2d 697 (App. 1996) (findin
Cranmer v. State 63 P.3d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Cranmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Cranmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Cranmer v. State 63 P.3d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
DISCUSSION I. Standard of Review ¶ 7 “When a special action proceeding initiated in superior court is appealed to this court, we must conduct a bifurcated review.”
Crumrine v. Stewart 24 P.3d 1281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Crumrine v. Stewart 24 P.3d 1281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Files v. Bernal 22 P.3d 57 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Files v. Bernal 22 P.3d 57 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001