Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc., 2 P.3d 687.

25 citing documents.

Harper v. State 388 P.3d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Harper v. State 388 P.3d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
§ 23- 1501(A); Galati, 205 Ariz. at 292, ¶ 5; see also Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc., ¶ 4 (App. 2000) (stating that the legislature’s intent in enacting the EPA was to limit the circumstances in which a terminated employee can sue).
ALOSI v. Hewitt 276 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
ALOSI v. Hewitt 276 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc., ¶ 2
Qwest Corp. v. City of Chandler 217 P.3d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Qwest Corp. v. City of Chandler 217 P.3d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Comm’n, (common law incorporated into contracts) (quotations and citations omitted); cf. Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc., ¶ 4 , (passage of legislation changes test to determine enforceability of contract from whether it is enforceable at common law to whether it complies with the statute).
Palmer v. Palmer 170 P.3d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Palmer v. Palmer 170 P.3d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
See also Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc., ¶ 9 , (similarly construing the word “expressly” in a different statute).
Ledvina v. Cerasani Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Ledvina v. Cerasani Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Facts and Procedural Background ¶2 Although we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party below, the essential facts are straightforward and undisputed.
Lamb Excavation v. Torrejon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Lamb Excavation v. Torrejon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
See Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc., P.3d 687 (App. 2000) (entry of summary judgment reviewed de novo); P.3d 7 (2003) (availability and propriety of equ itable relief reviewed de novo).
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc.
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc. 83 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc. 83 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
[9] Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc., ¶ 8
Galati v. America West Airlines, Inc. 69 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Galati v. America West Airlines, Inc. 69 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Laws 683 , 684.; see also Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc., ¶ 4 , (''the legislature's stated intent ...
Logan v. Forever Living Products International, Inc. 52 P.3d 760 Ariz. 2002
Taylor v. Graham County Chamber of Commerce 33 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Taylor v. Graham County Chamber of Commerce 33 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
BACKGROUND ¶ 2 Viewed in the light most favorable to Taylor, Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc., , the facts pertinent to this appeal are as follows.
State v. Wilson 26 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Wilson 26 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc.
Hahn v. Pima County 24 P.3d 614 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Hahn v. Pima County 24 P.3d 614 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
See also Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by