Cited by

Co., (“[T]he balancing of factors under [ARE] 403 is peculiarly a function of trial courts, not appellate courts.”), and we will not disturb the court’s ruling unless “no reasonable judge would have reached the same result under the circumstances.” ¶ 40 (2004) (citati

Co., ¶ 25 (App. 2000) (noting this court may affirm preclusion of evidence on any ground supported by the record).

Co., ¶ 25 (App. 2000), we conclude that the court did not err by granting summary judgment.

Co., ¶ 10 (App. 2000))).

Co., ¶ 22 (App. 2000) (“[A]lleged deficiencies in .

Co., -02, ¶ 19 (App. 2000).

Co., ¶¶ 28-30 (App. 2000).

Co., -02, ¶ 19 (App. 2000) ().

Co., ¶ 25 , we are reluctant to rule on grounds that the trial court did not address, cf. Rhoads v. Harvey Publ’ns, Inc., , (noting that the power to affirm a summary judgment on grounds not considered by the trial court “must be exercised

Co., , (“[T]he balancing of factors ...

¶ 44 On appeal from the granting of a motion to dismiss, we may affirm on any applicable basis, ¶ 25 , but we are reluctant to affirm on grounds not addressed by the trial court.

Co., (reviewing trial court’s motion in limine ruling on appeal); ¶¶ 6-8, (reviewing trial court’s evidentiary rulings on appeal); Stapert v. Ariz. Bd.