Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Marriage of Robinson and Thiel, 35 P.3d 89.
- Dekker v. Dekker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Dekker v. Dekker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Caskey v. Battani Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Caskey v. Battani
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
We review the family court’s decision as to the amount of child support for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 5, (citation omitted), and its interpretation of the Child Support Guidelines de novo, ¶ 5, (citation omitted).
- Nachiappan v. Subramanian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Nachiappan v. Subramanian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Natale v. Natale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Natale v. Natale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Hope v. Hope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Hope v. Hope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Cook v. Losnegard 265 P.3d 384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
- Cook v. Losnegard 265 P.3d 384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
- Patterson v. Patterson 248 P.3d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
-
Patterson v. Patterson
248 P.3d 204
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
In re Marriage of Robinson & Thiel, -33, ¶¶ 9-10 , -94 (App.2001).
- Jordan v. Rea 212 P.3d 919 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Jordan v. Rea 212 P.3d 919 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
- Engel v. Landman 212 P.3d 842 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-
Engel v. Landman
212 P.3d 842
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
¶ 14 , (disapproving the Black-Scholes valuation method).
- In Re the Marriage of Williams 200 P.3d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
- In Re the Marriage of Williams 200 P.3d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
- Hetherington v. Hetherington 202 P.3d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
-
Hetherington v. Hetherington
202 P.3d 481
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Although we will not disturb a court’s award of child support absent an abuse of its discretion, see In re Marriage of Robinson & Thiel, , 331 ¶ 5, we will review its “interpretation of the Guidelines de novo as a question of law.” , 220 ¶ 4
- Jenkins v. Jenkins 156 P.3d 1140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
-
Jenkins v. Jenkins
156 P.3d 1140
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
¶ 10 To support her claim that the family court erred by not imputing interest income from his 1031 property exchange to Father, Mother relies on
- Waldren v. State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security 131 P.3d 1067 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
-
Waldren v. State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security
131 P.3d 1067
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
(spousal maintenance); In re Marriage of Robinson & Thiel, ¶ 5 , (child support).
- Marriage of Brebaugh v. Deane 118 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
- Marriage of Brebaugh v. Deane 118 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
- Magee v. Magee 81 P.3d 1048 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- Magee v. Magee 81 P.3d 1048 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- Hamblen v. Hamblen 54 P.3d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002