Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Eller Media Co. v. City of Tucson, 7 P.3d 136.

111 citing documents.

Center Bay Gardens, L.L.C. v. City of Tempe City Council 153 P.3d 374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Case Corp. v. Gehrke 91 P.3d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Case Corp. v. Gehrke 91 P.3d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Martineau v. Maricopa County 86 P.3d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Martineau v. Maricopa County 86 P.3d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of Marana 81 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of Marana 81 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
1708 , 140 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1998) (in context of search and seizure, substantive due process is violated only when the government’s action shocks the conscience in a constitutional sense); , (noting that substantive due process “precludes government conduct that shocks the conscience”); , (applying “shocks the conscience” standard in context of substantive due process claim challenging application of S
Hanley v. Pearson 61 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Hanley v. Pearson 61 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of Tucson 59 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of Tucson 59 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002