Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hobson v. Mid-Century Insurance, 19 P.3d 1241.

80 citing documents.

Arizona Libertarian Party, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors 70 P.3d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Arizona Libertarian Party, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors 70 P.3d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Trust v. County of Yuma 69 P.3d 510 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Trust v. County of Yuma 69 P.3d 510 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State of Arizona v. Tyrone Vaughn Henry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Tyrone Vaughn Henry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Way v. State 67 P.3d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Way v. State 67 P.3d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
McMURREN v. JMC BUILDERS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
McMURREN v. JMC BUILDERS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Maricopa County v. Kinko's Inc. 56 P.3d 70 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Maricopa County v. Kinko's Inc. 56 P.3d 70 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State of Arizona v. Amiel Proto 58 P.3d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State of Arizona v. Amiel Proto 58 P.3d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway Department 54 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway Department 54 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
In Re the Detention of Wilber W. 53 P.3d 1145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
In Re the Detention of Wilber W. 53 P.3d 1145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Moore v. Browning 50 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Moore v. Browning 50 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Robson Ranch Mountains, L.L. C. v. Pinal County 51 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Robson Ranch Mountains, L.L. C. v. Pinal County 51 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Siddle 47 P.3d 1150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Siddle 47 P.3d 1150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
McMann v. City of Tucson 47 P.3d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
McMann v. City of Tucson 47 P.3d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Huskie 44 P.3d 161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Huskie 44 P.3d 161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Co., , (when underlying facts are not disputed “we determine de novo whether the trial court[ ] correctly interpreted and applied the relevant substantive law”).
Norgord v. State Ex Rel. Berning 33 P.3d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Norgord v. State Ex Rel. Berning 33 P.3d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Co., , (we review statutory interpx-etation and constitutional issues de novo).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by