Cited by

4 REDDING, et al. v. SOUTHEAST VALLEY Decision of the Court DISCUSSION ¶11 This court reviews an order granting summary judgment de novo, ¶ 12 (2003), and will affirm if it is correct for any reason

Sec., - 04 (App. 1995) (“[W]hen an administrative agency is acting in a judicial capacity and resolves disputed issues of fact properly before it which the parties have had an adequate opportunity to litigate, the courts have not hesitated to apply res judicata to enforce repose.” (citations omitted)).

(“Where a party does not appeal a final administrative decision that decision becomes final and res judicata.”).

This court will affirm the grant of summary judgment if it is correct for any reason

Sec., (noting that although issue and claim preclusion “have similar purposes, they are nevertheless different”).

This court reviews the entry of summary judgment de novo, to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enter., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007), and will affirm summary judgment if it is correct for any reason

This court reviews the entry of summary judgment de novo, to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enters., Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 2007), and will affirm if summary judgment is correct for any reason

This court reviews the entry of summary judgment de novo, to determine “whether any genuine issues of material fact exist,” Brookover v. Roberts Enter., Inc., , 55 ¶ 8, and will affirm the entry of summary judgment if it is correct for any reason