Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 53 P.3d 203.

1280 citing documents.

Lucian B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Lucian B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2002) (citing cases).
Donetrius W. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Donetrius W. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hannah B. v. Dcs, M.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hannah B. v. Dcs, M.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Danielle M. v. Dcs, T.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Danielle M. v. Dcs, T.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Rocco R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Rocco R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Janice H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Penny G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Janice H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (explaining that if sufficient evidence supports any of the statutory 5 JANICE H. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court grounds on which the court ordered severance, it is unnecessary to address argumen
Penny G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Edward S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Matthew D. v. Dcs, L.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Edward S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Matthew D. v. Dcs, L.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 4 (App. 2002) (“The juvenile court, as the trier of fact in a termination proceeding, is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and make appropriate findings.” (citation omitted)).
Mongco T., Jack v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Mongco T., Jack v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shannon S. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Elizabeth v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shannon S. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Elizabeth v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tabitha S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tabitha S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Eddie B. v. Dcs, E.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Eddie B. v. Dcs, E.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Anthony W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michael C. v. Dcs, X.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michael C. v. Dcs, X.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Anthony W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (holding that if evidence supports termination on any one statutory ground, this court need not consider challenges to the other grounds).
Laura L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Leticia A. v. Dcs, R.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Laura L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Leticia A. v. Dcs, R.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2002) (citing cases).
Nicholas T. v. Dcs, K.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Joshua H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Nicholas T. v. Dcs, K.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Joshua H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Additionally, Father changed his testimony from day one to day two of the severance trial.” The superior court “is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and make appropriate findings.” ¶ 4 (App. 2002).
Tomi M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Stella H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ellesse J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Neville T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Stella H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (explaining that if sufficient evidence supports any of the statutory grounds on which the court ordered severance, it is unnecessary to address arguments relating to the other grounds).
Tomi M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Neville T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ellesse J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jerome H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jerome H. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (if evidence supports termination on any DCS later amended the motion to include the allegation of fifteen- 3 months out-of-home placement.