Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Oscar O., 100 P.3d 943.
-
Kurwin M. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
- Brandi C., Jesse G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Brandi C., Jesse G. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We do not reweigh the evidence and have recognized the “juvenile court as the trier of fact in a termination proceeding is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and resolve disputed facts.” ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
- Jeremy M. v. Dcs, B.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, B.P.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004)).
- Riquelmer M. v. Dcs, S.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Riquelmer M. v. Dcs, S.M.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004)).
- Vernon H. v. Dcs, E.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Vernon H. v. Dcs, E.H.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004)).
- Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Roseann R. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), even when those facts are “sharply disputed,” Pima Cty.
- Michelle D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Michelle D. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
The juvenile court “is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of the witnesses, and resolve disputed facts.” 3 MICHELLE D. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
- Aprilleann H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Aprilleann H. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
- Emerald M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Emerald M. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004).
- Susan M. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Susan M. v. Dcs, E.M.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
-
Aaron B. v. Ashley H.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004)).
- Leticia P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Leticia P. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004)).
- Alexandra C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Alexandra C. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004)).
- Mark O. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Yvette L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Yvette L. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004)).
-
Mark O. v. Dcs, A.O.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we review an order adjudicating a child dependent for an abuse of discretion, Louis C. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 12 (App. 2015).
- Dawn B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Dawn B. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004).
- Jessica P. v. Dcs, H.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Jennifer B., Jonathan B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Jessica P. v. Dcs, H.P.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004).
-
Jennifer B., Jonathan B. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004)).
- Logan M. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Logan M. v. Dcs, J.M.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
- Jasmine H. v. Brian H., B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Jayson v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Jasmine H. v. Brian H., B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Jayson v. v. Dcs, A.V.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we will not disturb its findings unless no reasonable evidence supports the same, Willie G., 211 Ariz. at 235, ¶ 21.
- Maria v. v. Dcs, Z.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Maria v. v. Dcs, Z.G.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., 336, ¶¶ 4, 14 (App. 2004) (stating that the juvenile court, as the trier of fact, is in the “best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and resolve disputed facts”).
- Satava O. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Morgan B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Cristina G., Estevanico P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Cristina G., Estevanico P. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004).
-
Satava O. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
-
Morgan B. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004)).
- Matthew C. v. Dcs, M.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020