Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Oscar O., 100 P.3d 943.

575 citing documents.

Matthew C. v. Dcs, M.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), the uncontroverted evidence here shows that the Child recognized Father as his parent and Father acted "persistently to establish the [parent-child] relationship however possible."
Charles H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Anna S., Michael T. v. Dcs, E.S.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Anna S., Michael T. v. Dcs, E.S.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Charles H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we view the evidence and draw all reasonable inferences from it in the light most favorable to sustaining the court’s decision, Jordan C., 223 Ariz. at 93 ¶ 18.
Morgan F. v. Dcs, D.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Morgan F. v. Dcs, D.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Richard M. v. Patrick M. 462 P.3d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Richard M. v. Patrick M. 462 P.3d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Yvonne W. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Yvonne W. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Salynda H., Paul T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Julian D. v. McKenzi W., M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Salynda H., Paul T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004) (citations omitted); ¶ 16 (2016).
Julian D. v. McKenzi W., M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004) (referencing the child deriving an affirmative benefit from termination or incurring a detriment by continuing the relationship).
Rodney L., Deana L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rodney L., Deana L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Gladesa A. v. Dcs, N.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Gladesa A. v. Dcs, N.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Faith P. v. Dcs, L.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Troy C. v. Dcs, J.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Troy C. v. Dcs, J.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004)).
Faith P. v. Dcs, L.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004) (citations omitted); ¶ 16 (2016).
Rene T. v. Cynthia C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rene T. v. Cynthia C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Dawn S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dawn S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Yessica R., Efrain R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Yessica R., Efrain R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004) (citations omitted); accord Demetrius L., 239 Ariz. at 4, ¶ 16.
Silvino L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Silvino L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Keith R. v. Dcs, A.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Keith R. v. Dcs, A.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Shaquita H. v. Dcs, A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Erica H. v. Dcs, I.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Erica H. v. Dcs, I.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Shaquita H. v. Dcs, A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004)).
Serah E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Serah E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we view the evidence and draw all reasonable inferences from it in the light most favorable to sustaining the court’s decision.
Miriam F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Miriam F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004)).
Jessie D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Nathan T. v. Dcs, J.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Nathan T. v. Dcs, J.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 18 (App. 2009) ( ¶ 4 (App. 2004)).
Jessie D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
The juvenile court “is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and resolve disputed facts.” ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Rachael A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rachael A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
The juvenile court “is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and resolve disputed facts.” ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Michael M. v. Anita P., M.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Samantha D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Samantha D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).