Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Adrian E. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 158 P.3d 225.

148 citing documents.

In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to H.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to H.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to D.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to D.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2007) (internal quotations omitted).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to G.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to G.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2007) (internal quotation omitted).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.G. and C.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.G. and C.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2007) (cleaned up).
Andri K. v. Russell J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Andri K. v. Russell J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2007) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
Budziszewski v. budziszewski/campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Budziszewski v. budziszewski/campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 24 (App. 2007) (holding failure to object to exhibits at trial waives issue on appeal).
Jacob G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jacob G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jorden B. v. Dcs, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jorden B. v. Dcs, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Tracy D. , Tarah D. v. Dcs, T.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tracy D. , Tarah D. v. Dcs, T.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Brandi K., David C. v. Dcs, D.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Brandi K., David C. v. Dcs, D.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Michelle D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Michelle D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 24 (App. 2007) (court correctly considered an exhibit when the appellant failed to object to its admission).
Elbert H. v. Dcs, B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Elbert H. v. Dcs, B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We review the juvenile court’s denial of a motion to set aside for an abuse of discretion, Trisha A., 247 Ariz. at 91, ¶ 27, and reverse only if “the juvenile court’s exercise of that discretion was ‘manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons,’” ¶ 15 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 19 (App. 2005)).
Philip W. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Philip W. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
We review the juvenile court’s finding that a parent failed to appear without good cause for an abuse of discretion and will reverse only if “the juvenile court’s exercise of that discretion was ‘manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.’” ¶ 15 (App. 2007) ( ¶ 19 (App. 2005)).
Trisha A. v. Department of Child safety/l.A./l.A. 446 P.3d 380 Ariz. 2019
Brittany R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Brittany R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
4 BRITTANY R. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2007); Christy A., 217 Ariz. at 303, ¶ 12 (addressing a motion to set aside).
Ingrid G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ingrid G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Melissa T. v. Dcs, P.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Melissa T. v. Dcs, P.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2007) (quoting Lashonda M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Gateway v. Millennium Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Gateway v. Millennium Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 9 (App. 2007) (“The interpretation of a court rule presents a question of law that we review de novo.”) (citation omitted).
Trisha A. v. Dcs 424 P.3d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Trisha A. v. Dcs 424 P.3d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 9 (App. 2007) (“The plain language of this rule [Rule 64(C)] undeniably suggests parental rights may be terminated by default at any of the four types of hearings named in the rule, including status conferences.”).
Rodney S. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Rodney S. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2007); Christy A., 217 Ariz. at 303, ¶ 12 (addressing a motion to set aside).
Tzsiah E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tzsiah E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2007) (internal quotations and citation omitted).
Edward S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018