Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Xavier R. and Athena R. v. Ades and Joseph R., 280 P.3d 640.

69 citing documents.

In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Decision of the Court decision unless no reasonable evidence supports it, ¶ 11 (App. 2012).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to N.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to N.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sec., ¶ 8 (App. 2004) (citation omitted) and will affirm unless its findings were “clearly erroneous,” meaning there was “no reasonable evidence to support them.” ¶ 11 (App. 2012) (citations omitted).
Bonna D. v. Chelsea M., P.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Bonna D. v. Chelsea M., P.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Michael O. v. Dcs, C.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Michael O. v. Dcs, C.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we will affirm a termination decision unless no reasonable evidence supports it, ¶ 11 (App. 2012).
Samantha O. v. Jeffrey F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Samantha O. v. Jeffrey F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we will affirm a termination decision unless no reasonable evidence supports it, ¶ 11 (App. 2012).
Toren C., Fawn W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Toren C., Fawn W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we will 5 TOREN C., FAWN W. v. DCS et al. Decision of the Court affirm a termination decision unless no reasonable evidence supports it, ¶ 11 (App. 2012).
Deandre F. v. Dcs, A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Augustine D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Deandre F. v. Dcs, A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we will affirm a termination decision unless no reasonable evidence supports it, ¶ 11 (App. 2012).
Augustine D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we will affirm a termination decision unless no reasonable evidence supports it, ¶ 11 (App. 2012).
Jorden B. v. Dcs, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Jorden B. v. Dcs, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we will affirm a termination decision unless no reasonable evidence supports it, ¶ 11 (App. 2012).
Shelbie N. v. Dcs, A.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Shelbie N. v. Dcs, A.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we will affirm a termination decision unless no reasonable evidence supports it, ¶ 11 (App. 2012).
Kristina H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Kristina H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we will affirm a termination decision unless no reasonable evidence supports it, ¶ 11 (App. 2012).
Jasmaine H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jasmaine H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we will affirm a termination decision unless no reasonable evidence supports it, ¶ 11 (App. 2012).
Celso B., Cerena G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Celso B., Cerena G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we will affirm a termination decision unless no reasonable evidence supports it, ¶ 11 (App. 2012).
Graciela E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Graciela E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004), we will affirm a termination decision unless no reasonable evidence supports it, ¶ 11 (App. 2012).
Quinton v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Quinton v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-100, ¶ 11 (App. 2012) (citing Audra T., 194 Ariz. at 377, ¶ 2).
Nicole L. v. Dcs, N.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicole L. v. Dcs, N.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-100, ¶ 11 (App. 2012); see also A.R.S.
Kevin E. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Kevin E. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-100, ¶ 11 (App. 2012) (quoting In re Appeal in Maricopa County Juv.
Juan C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Juan C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jennifer P. v. Dcs, D.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jennifer P. v. Dcs, D.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-100, ¶ 11 (App. 2012); see also A.R.S.
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Xavier R. v. Joseph R. , , 99-100, ¶¶ 9, 11, , 643-44 (App. 2012).
Preciado v. Young America Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Preciado v. Young America Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 3, (citation and internal quotations omitted).
Sandra T. v. Trevor A., H.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sandra T. v. Trevor A., H.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
6 SANDRA T. v. TREVOR A., H.T.
Brenda M. , Peter O. v. Dcs, Z.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Brenda M. , Peter O. v. Dcs, Z.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Angela E. v. Dcs, R.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Angela E. v. Dcs, R.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
K.D. v. Hoffman 359 P.3d 1022 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
K.D. v. Hoffman 359 P.3d 1022 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
dency and severance proceedings.” Beene, 235 Ariz. at 304, ¶ 9 , 332 P.3d at 51 ; ¶ 15 , (“Arizona’s statutes, case law, and rules of procedure reflect that the juvenile court is obligated to oversee the dependency case, [and] to consider the best interests of the child in every decision____”); ¶ 6 , (juvenile court rule requiring attorney to state in notice of appeal that he has discussed merits of appeal and obtained authorization of client to file an appeal must be interpreted to protect chil