Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Pima County Dependency Action No. 93511, 744 P.2d 455.

109 citing documents.

Bob H. v. Arizona Dept. of Economic SEC. 237 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Andrew R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 224 P.3d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Andrew R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 224 P.3d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
¶ 15 Because the juvenile court is “in the best position to weigh the evidence, judge the credibility of the parties, observe the parties, and make appropriate factual findings,” Pima County Dependency Action No. 93511, , this court will not disturb the court’s disposition in a dependency action unless its findings of fact were clearly erroneous and there is no reasonable evidence to support them.
Kelly R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 137 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Kelly R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 137 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
See In re Pima County Dependency Action No. 93511, , M.M., 726 P.2d at 1121.
Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 83 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 83 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Because the trial court is “in the best position to weigh the evidence, judge the credibility of the parties, observe the parties, and make appropriate factual findings,” Pima County Dependency Action No. 93511, , this court will not reweigh the evidence but will look only to determine if there is evidence to sustain the court’s ruling.
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
In re Pima County Dependency Action No. 93511