Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-2397, 780 P.2d 407.

61 citing documents.

In Re Term of Parental Rights as to I.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to I.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Severance Action No. S-2397
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Severance Action No. S-2397
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Severance Action No. S-2397, (concluding the department “is clearly not obligated to provide services which are futile” because “no other services could be provided which had not already been offered”).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.S. and M.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.S. and M.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Severance Action No. S-2397, Mary Ellen C. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to X.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to X.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Severance Action No. S-2397
Kyle R., Dawna-Jo H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Kyle R., Dawna-Jo H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Severance Action No. S-2397
Meagen G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Meagen G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Severance Action No. S-2397
Veronica M. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Veronica M. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Severance Action No. S-2397
Martin J. v. Dcs, M.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Martin J. v. Dcs, M.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Severance Action No. S-2397
Adrienne D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Adrienne D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Severance Action No. S-2397, (DCS is not required to provide duplicative services); Mary Ellen C. v. Dep’t of Econ.
Walter C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Walter C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Severance Action No. S-2397, (holding that DCS is not required provide services that are already being received).
Haley W., Gary W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Haley W., Gary W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Severance Action No. S-2397, ).
Tiffani G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Tiffani G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Severance Action No. S-2397
Logan B. v. Dcs 422 P.3d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Logan B. v. Dcs 422 P.3d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Severance Action No. S-2397, -77 (App. 1989); Matter of Appeal In Pima Cty.
Linda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Linda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Severance Action No. S-2397
Brittnie C., Procoro R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Brittnie C., Procoro R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Severance Action No. S–2397, Mary Ellen C. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Mary C. v. Dcs, J.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Mary C. v. Dcs, J.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Severance Action No. S-2397, (DCS is not required to provide services that were already offered).
Ashley W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ashley W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See Pima County Severance Action No. S-2397, –78 (App. 1989) (affirming termination of parental rights where a parent failed to establish that her counsel's performance was both incompetent and prejudicial).
Amber S. v. Dcs, L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Amber S. v. Dcs, L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Severance Action No. S-2397, (citation omitted).
Paul v. Dana B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Paul v. Dana B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Severance Action No. S–2397, (affirming a juvenile court’s termination of parental rights where a parent failed to establish that her counsel’s performance was both incompetent and prejudicial).
Earl S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Earl S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶9 Father argues DCS must establish that “no other services could [have been] provided,” Pima County Severance Action No. S-2397
Joscilin S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Joscilin S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Severance Action No. S-2397
Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 256 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 256 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Severance Action No. S-2397, , (severance on grounds of mental illness upheld where evidence established “that no other services could be offered that had not already been offered that might preserve the family”); In re Maricopa Cnty.
John M. v. Ades, Shannon M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
John M. v. Ades, Shannon M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
See In re Pima County Severance Action No. S-2397, (counsel’s failure to call certain witnesses appeared to be “sound tactical 7 decision”; no evidence to suggest prejudice).
Vanessa H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 159 P.3d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 83 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004