Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Dependency Action No. 96290, 785 P.2d 121.

32 citing documents.

Handy v. Shaw Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Handy v. Shaw Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Dependency Action No. 96290, (explaining in a dependency action that parents’ present denial of responsibility for past abuse and neglect supports a finding they are not “presently willing to or capable of exercising proper and effective parental care and control”); see Shella H. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶¶ 16–1
Term of Parental Rights as to G.A. and G.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Term of Parental Rights as to G.A. and G.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Dependency Action No. 96290, (App. 1990) (noting that courts will “not hesitate to affirm” a finding that parents cannot exercise proper and effective parental care and control if the parents “deny that they are responsible for past abuse and neglect”).
Dias v. Mady Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Dias v. Mady Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Dependency Action No. 96290, (“[D]enial of responsibility supports a finding” that the parent is not “presently willing to or capable of exercising proper and effective parental care and control.”).
In Re Dependency as to A.B. and A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Dependency as to A.B. and A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
No. 96290, –05 (App. 1990) (explaining that state may proactively protect children where home conditions created dependency as to other children).
In Re Dependency as to R.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Dependency as to R.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Dependency Action No. 96290, see also Shella H., 239 Ariz. at 51 ¶ 16.
Camare M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Camare M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Dependency Action No. 96290
Juliette F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Juliette F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Dependency Action No. 96290
Jamie F. v. Dcs, D.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jamie F. v. Dcs, D.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Dependency Action No. 96290, (explaining that when “conditions creating the dependency .
Mark O. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Mark O. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dependency Action No. 96290
Francine C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Francine C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dependency Action No. 96290, (imminent risk of harm).
Deborah S. v. Dcs, M.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Deborah S. v. Dcs, M.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dependency Action No. 96290, -05 (App. 1990).
Aaron W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Aaron W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Dependency Action No. 96290, (imminent risk of harm).
Adrian B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Adrian B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
at ¶¶ 16- 17; see also Pima County Juvenile Dependency Action No. 96290, -05 (App. 1990).
Eugene W. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Eugene W. v. Dcs, P.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dependency Action No. 96290, Pima Cty.
Shella H. v. Department of Child Safety 366 P.3d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Shella H. v. Department of Child Safety 366 P.3d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dependency Action No. 96290, (“A finding of dependency may be predicated on one parent’s failure to prevent abuse by another parent.”) (citing Pima Cnty.
State v. Rushton 837 P.2d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Rushton 837 P.2d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Action No. 96290, , (psychiatric social worker was treating child for “medical” purposes within the meaning of exception to hearsay rule).